Options
concave surfaces
DanArgent
Posts: 53
I have noticed that on most coins the background on the obverse is usualy a bit concave. Some coins are more than others. Is a higher degree of concavity desirable or not?
I also noticed that is is common for the image on the coin to be off center. Is this desirable or not?
Dan
I also noticed that is is common for the image on the coin to be off center. Is this desirable or not?
Dan
0
Comments
can have a dramatic affect on how the coins look as they wear since the concave side
will wear inward from the rim and the convex side will wear outward from the center.
The older Washington clad quarter had the large relatively smooth portrait of Washing-
ton to take the blunt of the wear on the convex obverse and the edge lettering and
rim to take it on the concave reverse. The concavity was reversed in '96 though.
This shape also determines their path through the air so on pre '96 issues it's better
to call tails and on the later ones, heads.
My question was more about the degree of concavity. If I have two ms-60 quarters and one is more concave than the other which is more valuable?
Dan
<< <i>are you serious about the coin fliping thing or was that just a joke? >>
About half serious. A coin is likely to change sides one or more times after it's dropped.
If it doesn't then it's a lttle more likely to end up concave side up which means tails.
<< <i>
My question was more about the degree of concavity. If I have two ms-60 quarters and one is more concave than the other which is more valuable?
Dan >>
In the series I'm familiar with there is little variability in concavity within a date. There
may be slight diffferences in die preparation or strike characteristics but the aim for all
the coins is identical. Certainly specialists would be interested in this since it would con-
stitute a die variety, but you'd have to find the interested collector.
What coins are they?
Jefferson Nickels?