Home U.S. Coin Forum

At what point would a coin have so much damage/corrosion/wear that you'd no longer consider it to be

Just wondering.

I, personally, would stop looking at the object as a "coin" when I could no longer determine the type by inspection.

How about you?

Dan

Comments

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    sounds reasonable to me
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I propose a new grade that is lower than PO-01: "Non-Coin-0." It would be reserved for corroded brown disks that might have once been large cents, and other various round metal early-1800's things that were worn smooth and subsequently trampled by horses. Of course, there would need to be a registry set for these things.
  • Hey mgoodm3. I just PM'd You.
    Actually learning a few things here. What a great site.

    My Ebay Sales
  • Well, I think you've gone too far, if magnetic sensitive dies, MRI's and Xrays can't identify the date anymore.
    It could simply be a old utility power box hole filler at that point.
    besides what good is a bunch of old corroded discs if you can't tell what the date is, etc.

    image
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    the existing term for such unrecognizable pieces of metal is "cull".

    K S
  • When it is no longer accepted as "money".

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file