Has Superior blew past Heritage as the #1 auctioneer of High End PCGS Registry Sets ?
STEWARTBLAYNUMIS
Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭
It seems that since Steve Deeds joined Bowers and Merena Auctions that they are auctioning more high end top PCGS Registry sets.At the ANA they will be auctioning the Klingensmith Lincoln collection,Bad Boys Bail Bonds Proof Lincoln Cent Set,Carl Womack Buffalo Nickel Collection and perhaps a few others.Does anyone have any insights into this phenomena.
Stewart
0
Comments
Steve Deeds is at Bowers and Merena these days.
RELLA
who boasts of twenty years experience in his craft
while in fact he has had only one year of experience...
twenty times.
RELLA
who boasts of twenty years experience in his craft
while in fact he has had only one year of experience...
twenty times.
Stewart,
I think you mean "Has B & M blown past Heritage...?" That's a tough question. I certainly think that Heritage is losing market share, that's for sure. ANR is coming on strong, Deeds move to B&M can only help them, but Heritage is still chugging along. Overall, my impression is that the playing field is leveling for collectors wishing to liquidate their holdings.
B & M does have picture quality issues to resolve, but Heritage has the furthest to go of any of the big auction houses.
That is why they are selling all my dollar sets at the PRE-ANA sale,
Larry
POB 854
Temecula CA 92593
310-541-7222 office
310-710-2869 cell
www.LSRarecoins.com
Larry@LSRarecoins.com
PCGS Las Vegas June 24-26
Baltimore July 14-17
Chicago August 11-15
1. SUPERIOR GALLERIES 94.8%
2. STACK'S 49%
3. HERITAGE RARE COIN GALLERIES 40.7%
4. AMERICAN NUMISMATIC RARITIES 18.9%
5. IRA & LARRY GOLDBERG 2%
6. BOWERS & MERENA 0.7%
*Based on each company's internet-posted prices realized from 2003 for full catalog format auctions. All numbers rounded to nearest tenth of one percent. (from Superior's website)
Isolated '03 numbers are probably do in part to mergers & acquisitions. I am sure that the 2004 numbers are a bit different.
Wondercoin
Heritage didn't do me any favors-and their fees are way too high.
In the end, Heritage will continue to get more Registry sets because of their sheer size and advertising might.
It was quite a significant error on their part.
I would be thrilled to be a seller of coins with B&M but would be scared to death to buy anything through their auctions!
RELLA
who boasts of twenty years experience in his craft
while in fact he has had only one year of experience...
twenty times.
It all depends on what you negotiate.
Superior's sleazy advertising just turns me off. I wouldn't consign to them unless they beat the other commisions by at least a few percent. I just don't feel comfortable with their whole scene. Steve Deeds made a good move imo.
roadrunner
Superior has always been above board with me and my coins, too bad Steve left.
I wish I could say the same about Heritage, but I cant they lost 2 POP 1 coins and mishandled a 3rd that cost me over $14k (without juice).
Now you tell me would I ever use Haritage? Hell NO If I wanted a coin bad enough I would find someone bigger than me to buy it on my behalf, or maybe I just dont need it bad enough.
If Heritage "seems" to be losing market share, do you not think they will figure it out how to win the consignor's? I think Heritage is like the giant ship that takes too long to turn. They better keep in touch with the competition.
About the reserves posted. WOW. ABSOLUTELY benefits the buyer, NEVER the seller. What if everyone bid CLOSE to the reserve, and then decided not to bid more. ??? The auction sight and the consignor LOSES, because the coin didnt sell. The buyer could then contact (you can find anyone) the consignor, and buy it directly, leaving the auction house without any commission!!! Furthermore, if the reserve was NOT posted in any way, (Like most major auction houses in the world), the consignor could make quite a bit if a couple bidders were really going at it. In a hot market, maybe this doesnt matter much, but it could cut out a sale for the auction house, and the consignor. I WOULDNT WANT ANYONE TO KNOW MY RESERVE. IF IT DOESNT HIT MY RESERVE, IT IS NO BUYER'S BUSINESS WHAT I WANTED. IT IS STILL MINE.
I don't really know if that helped me get the coins sold or not. If that is the case, then I don't think showing the reserves is bad. If a coin did not sell, its still has that stigma. I don't think having people knowing the reserve makes it any worse.
Mike
1. SUPERIOR GALLERIES 94.8%
2. STACK'S 49%
3. HERITAGE RARE COIN GALLERIES 40.7%
4. AMERICAN NUMISMATIC RARITIES 18.9%
5. IRA & LARRY GOLDBERG 2%
6. BOWERS & MERENA 0.7%
*Based on each company's internet-posted prices realized from 2003 for full catalog format auctions. All numbers rounded to nearest tenth of one percent. (from Superior's website)
I'm not sure how this info was tabulated, but how can a company grow 18.9% in the first year of its existence, i.e. when one year earlier it did not exist at all? ANR was founded in February/March 2003, so I'd like to know what baseline number was used in this statistical analysis.
Betts medals, colonial coins, US Mint medals, foreign coins found in early America, and other numismatic Americana