Newbie Dumb Question
Sn3nut
Posts: 41
I’m new to the forum and I understand that I am entitled to one “newbie” dumb question without too much harassment. I am, however, wearing my asbestos underwear just in case the flaming gets too hot! I’m not quite sure if this is a Set Registry question, but hopefully you guys can set me straight.
I have just entered my first two sets into the Set Registry. In one of the sets, I have a mediocre 1970-S Proof Jefferson Nickel. On the label, it shows PCGS number 94202.67 (which should be a PR67 DCAM.) The cert number is 5411453. However, the label shows the coin as a PR67CA rather than a DCAM. I tend to agree that the coin is a CA instead of a DCAM.
Now here is the interesting part. When I entered the cert number into the Set Registry, it came up as a DCAM, making my set show as 100% DCAM set. It’s not that I’m worried about wrongfully knocking someone out of a top spot. After all, my set (Jefferson Nickels Basic Set, Proof, 1965 to Present) is only ranked 38 out of the 66 sets, and I plan on replacing the coin with a much nicer one as soon as possible.
But what should I do about the incorrect label? And just how common is this type of occurrence in PCGS graded coins? I would never have noticed it if I hadn’t entered it into the Registry.
Thanks for the help,
Sn3nut
I have just entered my first two sets into the Set Registry. In one of the sets, I have a mediocre 1970-S Proof Jefferson Nickel. On the label, it shows PCGS number 94202.67 (which should be a PR67 DCAM.) The cert number is 5411453. However, the label shows the coin as a PR67CA rather than a DCAM. I tend to agree that the coin is a CA instead of a DCAM.
Now here is the interesting part. When I entered the cert number into the Set Registry, it came up as a DCAM, making my set show as 100% DCAM set. It’s not that I’m worried about wrongfully knocking someone out of a top spot. After all, my set (Jefferson Nickels Basic Set, Proof, 1965 to Present) is only ranked 38 out of the 66 sets, and I plan on replacing the coin with a much nicer one as soon as possible.
But what should I do about the incorrect label? And just how common is this type of occurrence in PCGS graded coins? I would never have noticed it if I hadn’t entered it into the Registry.
Thanks for the help,
Sn3nut
Bob, the "Sn3nut"
My 1949 Mint Set
My 1949 Mint Set
0
Comments
Based in your explanation, looks like a database mistake. I don't believe in a wrong labeling.
Answering your question, it's not common to happening, but should.
If you want clarify the doubt, send an e-mail to B J Searls - bj@collectors.com
Edson
<< <i>Based in your explanation, looks like a database mistake. >>
I agree.
Here's a set with a similar error.
Note the 1967 that is designated cameo - in a business strike set. Good luck getting yours corrected. The error in that set has been pointed out numerous times for months now and it's still there.
Russ, NCNE
Later, Paul.
Later, Paul.
Did you have to flame the new person so mercilessly?
Mark
P.S.:
P.P.S.: WELCOME!
The Problem Is Because They Grade Coins The Same Way That Henry Ford Produced Cars ( Mass Production).
They Simply Don't Have The Time To Devote To Each Coin. Grading Milions Of Coins Is Bound To Create Errors ( The Same Thing Happens At The Mint )
If You Contact Pcgs, They Will Re- Grade The Coin At No Cost To
You.
Welcome To The Forum !!!
If you e-mail pcgs they will help you. I once had a simular coin/holder issue. They took care of it.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay