Since there appear to be a couple people who couldn't figure out what "I know the answer, but I'm smart enough to keep it to myself" was for , yes, it's the PCGS graded PR69 that is a plate coin in their grading guide.
There is a persistent rumor that the coin is the work of a talented doctor out of the Chicago area. I actually asked David Hall about it last year. You can read his answer here:
NT, proof toning. I've seen it before, but not this nice. It almost does look like it was doctored, but who knows. If someone would sell it to me for AT price, hell, call it AT all day and all night for all I care. It's a nice coin.
Hey Russ, that 3rd choice in the poll was for people that "know the answer", all I knew was the coin was in the 1st PCGS book, whether it is AT or not I have no idea.
>>>There is a persistent rumor that the coin is the work of a talented doctor out of the Chicago area. I actually asked David Hall about it last year. You can read his answer here.<<<
Russ, I personally met this so-called coindoctor back 7 or 8 years ago at a coin show in St. Louis back when I was collecting MS Buffalo's and had almost a complete set of Buffalos in mint state 65 up, and I can tell you from a "personal" experience with this young man that he is the best of the best, and would call him an artist, not a coindoctor, when it comes to nickel coinage....
At the time he couldn't doctor silver or copper..... Also from what I've been told he no longer does this, because he got religion, but I can't verify that this is true, but I do know for a fact that he has several Buffalo's in PCGS and NGC holders that he made......
BTW..... This guy is one of the most engaging individuals you will ever meet.
So for clarification..... the buffalo could be real, or could be AT, or could be re-toned, which makes it semi-real, and DH isn't really sure if it's real or not, or if he knows, he's not saying... and if it was doctored, which may not be true, it's probably not by the guy you think it was, or could have been, although one of the culprits, who may not have done it, has since found God......
My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
<< <i>So for clarification..... the buffalo could be real, or could be AT, or could be re-toned, which makes it semi-real, and DH isn't really sure if it's real or not, or if he knows, he's not saying... and if it was doctored, which may not be true, it's probably not by the guy you think it was, or could have been, although one of the culprits, who may not have done it, has since found God...... >>
To clarify this for you Myqqy, (and this is just my opinion), the coin is naturally toned..... This coin is one of the most sought after Buffalo's in existance, and having met, and known the man in question, I think if he had done this coin he would have said something to me about it, because one of the things he was proud to point out was the Buffalo's he had worked his magic on, and this coin was never mentioned to me by him.
<< <i>So for clarification..... the buffalo could be real, or could be AT, or could be re-toned, which makes it semi-real, and DH isn't really sure if it's real or not, or if he knows, he's not saying... and if it was doctored, which may not be true, it's probably not by the guy you think it was, or could have been, although one of the culprits, who may not have done it, has since found God...... >>
no, the clarification is simply: the coin is definitely ARTIFICIALLY toned. the guy who did it freely admits it. he explained how he did with chemical vapors, but i didn't understand the process.
why? because the coin really is high-grade (ms-68-ish), & not every attempt to a-t succeeds. in fact, most attempts fail. you get success in like 1 out of 10 attempts, so to do this on, say a roll of 1918/7's would be incredibly stupid & expensive. haven't you noticed that most wild'n'crazy colors are in fact on commons?
That coin is not a high-grade common 1936-P MS coin, but rather a very high-grade 1936 Proof. You had better know exactly what you're doing before trying to AT a coin like that.
Whether it is NT or AT, it is one beautiful piece!
<< <i>That coin is not a high-grade common 1936-P MS coin, but rather a very high-grade 1936 Proof. You had better know exactly what you're doing before trying to AT a coin like that.
Whether it is NT or AT, it is one beautiful piece!
Myqqy said: So for clarification..... the buffalo could be real, or could be AT, or could be re-toned, which makes it semi-real, and DH isn't really sure if it's real or not, or if he knows, he's not saying... and if it was doctored, which may not be true, it's probably not by the guy you think it was, or could have been, although one of the culprits, who may not have done it, has since found God......
I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
Comments
When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
Thomas Paine
Why step over the dollar to get to the cent? Because it's a 55DDO.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Hey Russ -- good timing too -- Tuesday night!
Michael
Seriously from the photos I think it would grade at any of the top 3 TPG's.
<< <i>I will let you know how it comes out when PCGS grades it. >>
Michael
<< <i>Cleaned and retoned nicely but would BB at the majors...Doug >>
peacockcoins
Banned in 5...4...3...2...1
There is a persistent rumor that the coin is the work of a talented doctor out of the Chicago area. I actually asked David Hall about it last year. You can read his answer here:
Question about the 1936 proof Buffalo featured in the PCGS grading guide.
Russ, NCNE
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
<< <i>Looks a lot like a coin in the 1st PCGS book. >>
It's still in the second edition! mike
<< <i><<<I know the answer, but I'm smart enough to keep it to myself.>>> if we were afraid of bannation by DH. >>
I guess that could have a dual meaning.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>There is a persistent rumor that the coin is the work of a talented doctor out of the Chicago area. >>
it's not a rumor! however, the coin doctor in question is not who some of you assume it is.
K S
Looks cool, not sure if it's AT or not ... so, what's the answer???
Spanky
Russ, I personally met this so-called coindoctor back 7 or 8 years ago at a coin show in St. Louis back when I was collecting MS Buffalo's and had almost a complete set of Buffalos in mint state 65 up, and I can tell you from a "personal" experience with this young man that he is the best of the best, and would call him an artist, not a coindoctor, when it comes to nickel coinage....
At the time he couldn't doctor silver or copper..... Also from what I've been told he no longer does this, because he got religion, but I can't verify that this is true, but I do know for a fact that he has several Buffalo's in PCGS and NGC holders that he made......
BTW..... This guy is one of the most engaging individuals you will ever meet.
Tom
<< <i>So for clarification..... the buffalo could be real, or could be AT, or could be re-toned, which makes it semi-real, and DH isn't really sure if it's real or not, or if he knows, he's not saying... and if it was doctored, which may not be true, it's probably not by the guy you think it was, or could have been, although one of the culprits, who may not have done it, has since found God......
>>
To clarify this for you Myqqy, (and this is just my opinion), the coin is naturally toned..... This coin is one of the most sought after Buffalo's in existance, and having met, and known the man in question, I think if he had done this coin he would have said something to me about it, because one of the things he was proud to point out was the Buffalo's he had worked his magic on, and this coin was never mentioned to me by him.
<< <i>So for clarification..... the buffalo could be real, or could be AT, or could be re-toned, which makes it semi-real, and DH isn't really sure if it's real or not, or if he knows, he's not saying... and if it was doctored, which may not be true, it's probably not by the guy you think it was, or could have been, although one of the culprits, who may not have done it, has since found God...... >>
no, the clarification is simply: the coin is definitely ARTIFICIALLY toned. the guy who did it freely admits it. he explained how he did with chemical vapors, but i didn't understand the process.
K S
why would someone want to spend the effort to tone a 1936-P?
Because people pay stupid money for toned coins.
peacockcoins
K S
no, the clarification is simply: the coin is definitely ARTIFICIALLY toned.
I'm glad that I was able to clarify this issue, and that others confirmed my clarity....
<< <i>To clarify this for you Myqqy, (and this is just my opinion), the coin is naturally toned....
no, the clarification is simply: the coin is definitely ARTIFICIALLY toned.
I'm glad that I was able to clarify this issue, and that others confirmed my clarity.... >>
All I gave you was my opinion...... The Dork on the otherhand gave you his opinion, which in my opinion he is full of chit! Vapors my a$$!
high-grade 1936 Proof. You had better know exactly what you're doing
before trying to AT a coin like that.
Whether it is NT or AT, it is one beautiful piece!
Ken
<< <i>That coin is not a high-grade common 1936-P MS coin, but rather a very
high-grade 1936 Proof. You had better know exactly what you're doing
before trying to AT a coin like that.
Whether it is NT or AT, it is one beautiful piece!
Ken >>