POLL: Buffalo nickel grading quiz. See if you agree with PCGS. Answer revealed.
mgoodm3
Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
Which one graded MS66?. The other graded MS65.
#1
#2
#1
#2
coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
0
Comments
#2 MS-66
#1 looks better so it must be the MS65 example or you wouldn't have started the thread in the first place.
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
Al
The second one cannot be a MS-66. Of course there are other factors as well.
#1 looks nicer. It has a nice, frosty look (makes me want to eat a frosted doughnut). I voted that #1 was the 66.
Our eBay auctions - TRUE auctions: start at $0.01, no reserve, 30 day unconditional return privilege & free shipping!
#1 Obverse is nice however.
Of course, since you really can't judge the luster with a photo there really is no way to tell.
jom
#2 is MS65
42/92
what I'm talking about since there is a fifty percent chance )
edit to fix the spelling of fitty
IMHO, # 1 has too many hits on the buffalo, and a flat tail, s/b a 65.
# 2 has small to med hits all over the indian and buffalos, and scuffs on indians cheekbone, s/b a 64.
Gradeflation strikes again !!
Steve from MA
The second is in a 65 holder (rattler). It's cleaner on the rev and more marks on the obv than #1. A little better strike. luster is good but can't compare with #1.
You guys seemed to agree with PCGS at least on average. The differences are pretty subtle.
That's a big hit across the Buffalo's beard on the first coin. I realize the image is enlarged, but I'm a bit surprised it graded MS66. The obverse, however, is very nice.
K S