Grades are in, not to bad getting a little better and....
bearcave
Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
a little worse. 
Some of these came out where I thought they should but on a few I thought they should grade a point higher. (but don't we all!)
1c 1955D RD PCGS 66
1c 1957 RD PCGS 65
1c 1957D RD PCGS 65
1c 1960D Small Date RD PCGS 64 (thought this one should go 65 or 66 with the ones above)
1c 2001 RD PCGS 67
1c 2002 RD PCGS 66
1c 2002D RD PCGS 67
5c 2001D PCGS 66 Full Steps (thought both these Jeffs were 65
)
5c 2001P PCGS 66 Full Steps
10c 2001D FB PCGS 68
10c 2001P FB PCGS 68
10c 2002D FB PCGS 67
10c 2002P FB PCGS 66
50c 1964 PCGS 68 Proof
50c 1964 Accented Hair PCGS 67 Proof
50c 2002P PCGS 66
sthd 2001D Kentucky PCGS 66
SAC$ 2001P PCGS 66
SAC$ 2002D PCGS 67
SAC$ 2002P PCGS 67
Date Received 04/30/04
The Pop's are not to bad on these and on the 2001 P Roosevelt Dime my Population Book for 2004 does not list any in FB. I wonder what the Pop is on it?
Some of these came out where I thought they should but on a few I thought they should grade a point higher. (but don't we all!)
1c 1955D RD PCGS 66
1c 1957 RD PCGS 65
1c 1957D RD PCGS 65
1c 1960D Small Date RD PCGS 64 (thought this one should go 65 or 66 with the ones above)
1c 2001 RD PCGS 67
1c 2002 RD PCGS 66
1c 2002D RD PCGS 67
5c 2001D PCGS 66 Full Steps (thought both these Jeffs were 65
)5c 2001P PCGS 66 Full Steps
10c 2001D FB PCGS 68
10c 2001P FB PCGS 68
10c 2002D FB PCGS 67
10c 2002P FB PCGS 66
50c 1964 PCGS 68 Proof
50c 1964 Accented Hair PCGS 67 Proof
50c 2002P PCGS 66
sthd 2001D Kentucky PCGS 66
SAC$ 2001P PCGS 66
SAC$ 2002D PCGS 67
SAC$ 2002P PCGS 67
Date Received 04/30/04
The Pop's are not to bad on these and on the 2001 P Roosevelt Dime my Population Book for 2004 does not list any in FB. I wonder what the Pop is on it?
Ken
0
Comments
<< <i>The Pop's are not to bad on these and on the 2001 P Roosevelt Dime my Population Book for 2004 does not list any in FB. I wonder what the Pop is on it? >>
2001P Rosy MS68FB pop = 109