I don't know why I feel compelled to write about this...
XpipedreamR
Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
I like 1943 cents. I have them all in PCGS MS67. I think they're neat.
I was at a coin show this week, and I saw a dealer had an MS68...so I was all excited to check it out.
The thing was a turd. It had a big(relatively speaking) splotch on the reverse, and scattered dings on the obverse and reverse.
I think my 66's and 67's look better than it. What a let-down
I guess you know what they say about buying the coin vs. the holder...
I was at a coin show this week, and I saw a dealer had an MS68...so I was all excited to check it out.
The thing was a turd. It had a big(relatively speaking) splotch on the reverse, and scattered dings on the obverse and reverse.
I think my 66's and 67's look better than it. What a let-down
I guess you know what they say about buying the coin vs. the holder...
0
Comments
I think it was possibly a low-end 68 technically, but the eye appeal was just not there. I wouldn't have paid 67 money for it.
Maybe I was being too hard on the coin. I was really expecting the be impressed, and I wasn't at all.
MS68s should be impressive....
What's an PCGS MS68 1943-P Lincoln go for, these days? Back in my Registry type set era, I seem to recall they were goin' for about $900, which blew my mind. Then it dropped down to around $600, I think. I was happy enough to stay with my $45 PCGS MS67. (And I had a '43-S at that price).
That grade of coin should have outstanding ete appeal.IMHO as well !
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
seems that they have better eye appeal than lower end unc coins. (Besides,
no one sends a coin like that in if they think it is circulated, so you already
have 1 vote of confidence in it's quality!)
I have often wondered how coins with no visual appeal get the MS67/68
grades when a nice MS65 looks far better.