PCGS MS68 Buffalo!

Shamika

Check it out!

Bikingnut

When I win the lottery this week, I'll bid. Very nice coin.

Monstavet

I am not that familiar with this series, but the LIBERTY looks to be very weakly struck...is that typical for this date?

LanLord

<< <i>I am not that familiar with this series, but the LIBERTY looks to be very weakly struck...is that typical for this date? >>

Usually on T1 1913 coins, Liberty is part of the rim, this has awsome separation

LanLord

The level of detail in the buffalo head, shoulders and neck are pretty incredible as well.

EvilMCT

She's a beauty. I think I'll have to stick to a 65 or 66 tho. It's just a little too pricey for my budget.

Ken

291fifth

Even though it is a nice coin would you really want to tie up significant money in such a common date? I recently bought a very nice looking MS63 of this date for $35. That is all I want to tie up.

jom

Yes, it has a great strike but that coins better have truly amazing/incredible/whoop-te-do luster or it really isn't all that different than a 67.

jom

Steve27

Doesn't appear to be a mark on it.

OnlyBuffalos

What I found interesting is how well the Heritage pictures show - is how difficult it can be to evaluate a coin from internet photographs.

Compare the right most hind leg on the coin's reverse in the top set of photographs to the set of photographs on the bottom.

If the bottom set accurately depicted the coin, it would be at best MS66 because of the weak strike on the hind leg.











.

Fountainhead

The fuzzy peripheries may be a depth-of-field artifact of the photograph itself - the photographer concentrated on the higher, closer devices of the coin, wrong F-stop, etc...

Hello, forum coin photographers, what do you think?

coinlieutenant

If the coin has great luster, which I am sure that it does, then I would agree with the grade...

I see one little tick in the hair... Southeast of the feather tie...

John

Picture could be better IMO..

John

FullHorn

<< <i>The fuzzy peripheries may be a depth-of-field artifact of the photograph itself - the photographer concentrated on the higher, closer devices of the coin, wrong F-stop, etc >>

or maybe put some more light on it
Real nice coin, but I sure could buy a whole bunch of nice ones for the price that puppy will go for.

caitlin

Wow Nice coin and JOM this one has my name all over it, so don't touch.

mgoodm3

<< <i>The fuzzy peripheries may be a depth-of-field artifact of the photograph itself - the photographer concentrated on the higher, closer devices of the coin, wrong F-stop, etc...

Hello, forum coin photographers, what do you think? >>



The depth of field can be incredibly small with an open aperture and close focus, less than a mm.