Home PCGS Set Registry Forum

I've never seen anyone stoop so low !!! Revised-Equal Time to the other side...

This guy is trying to make us all look bad by helping some one else circumvent the system while pocketing the cash.
Check out this auction and then post your comments.
I think David Hall should be made aware of this!!!

imageimageimage

Comments

  • that sure is counterfeiting to me.
    The guy could get one of the snap together slab blanks and make up something that would pass muster to most people.
    image
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    Ethics aside... if I were going to sell an insert, I sure as heck wouldnt put the number in the auction. Anybody can put that number in their set, and the new owner would have to e-mail a pic of the slab (with the coin in it) to PCGS to get it deleted from the other person's set.

    David
  • cointimecointime Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ernie et al,
    This was a hot topic a year or so ago. Man did this stir up a hornet nest image There were reports of people using certs from coins they did not own. You could say they were virtual sets, phantom sets in a sence. Anyway this is out right wrong and I doubt the auction listing makes it for too long, so I did two screen shots and pasted them in a MSword(C) doc for others reading this and not getting a chance to see the auction page.... Just Click on this and either save to disk or select open. It will require MS Word to view it.

    Ken
  • sumduncesumdunce Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭✭
    Or someone could just email PCGS the details about the auction and have them take care of this insert sans slab. image
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    Thanks Ken,

    I have just sent a post and the link to David Halls Q&A Forum....Whether they will address it in an open forum is yet to be seen.
    Only time will tell.
  • He is a scumbag!
  • BubbleheadBubblehead Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭
    It's worth fifty cents. If anyone were to enter the cert # into a registry set, it wouldn't create a problem for anyone. Think about it. It's probably from a crackout resubmit. The coin would have been holdered under a different cert#. No problem at all. If you send it in to PCGS, they'll post a fifty cent credit. It's tacky, but not not all that much of a scam....IMHO... image
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    But, it does create a problem for us.
    It is part of the reason that the POPs are so out of whack.
    How are we ever going to get a handle on the POPs if peaople are selling the Cert #s instead of turning them in? image
  • What would be worse is someone using the labels in new coin slab holders and then selling them off to unsuspecting buyers as genuine.
    It completely destroys the concept that a slab could be bought, without being personally viewed, by a customer.
    You would have to carefully examine the slab to see if it was the correct one or not, before you purchase, as the labels maybe genuine, but the slab and coin aren't.
    image
    image
  • ccrdragonccrdragon Posts: 2,697
    I sent BJ an email with the link and suggested that he remove the cert number from the database to prevent anybody from using it. I have also added this dealer to my list of sellers not to buy from on ebay...
    Cecil
    Total Copper Nutcase - African, British Ships, Channel Islands!!!
    'Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup'


  • << <i>I sent BJ an email with the link and suggested that he ... >>



    BJ is a LADY, my man. And I see nothing wrong with this auction. There is nothing dishonest with the auction. If someone actually uses the cert number in a phantom set, then the set registrant is being dishonest. However, there is no justification for condemning the auctioneer. You call yourselves Christians?? ( I don't know the auctioneer or have any connection or interest in the auction).
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • ccrdragonccrdragon Posts: 2,697
    Excuse me?

    The man - IN THE AUCTION - is encouraging the buyer to be dishonest. How can you possibly condone that?
    Cecil
    Total Copper Nutcase - African, British Ships, Channel Islands!!!
    'Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup'


  • << <i>Excuse me?

    The man - IN THE AUCTION - is encouraging the buyer to be dishonest. How can you possibly condone that? >>


    Thats an easy question to answer: I'm a lawyer.image
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    I don't know who's funnier, the guy selling the cert or you guys. You make is sound as if there are no phantom coins in the registry.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • lavalava Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Excuse me?

    The man - IN THE AUCTION - is encouraging the buyer to be dishonest. How can you possibly condone that? >>


    Thats an easy question to answer: I'm a lawyer.image >>



    Bushmaster8, I think you need to do a reality check. As a fellow attorney, I need to do a few of those myself from time to time. I think it is troublesome for members, myself included, to think that there is a market besides PCGS (standing offer of .50) for an insert apart from the slab, and this undermines the accuracy of the population reporting system.

    Even more offensive is that this particular seller is attmepting to market the insert by suggesting the insert be used as a tool to carry out a fraud. Even if the seller were to be given the benefit of the doubt initially, that is no longer the case after seeing the lengths this seller will go to to remind buyers of the improper ways the insert can be used.
    I brake for ear bars.
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    Lava, Very well said.. image

    Any way you look at it, this guy is advocating FRAUD!
    What else can you say about this statement:

    "If you want you could put this # into your PCGS set registry and it would show you had a real Georgia MS67 quarter in your set (saving you hundreds of $$$). You could even take your real Georgia MS67 out, sell it, and put this one in. Technically nothing would have changed. But I dont know who would want to do that."

    This is no different than writing a book telling you how to build a bomb...and they are prosecuting people for that now, aren't they? image

    added last line.
  • BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
    "I am a lawyer and I see nothing wrong with this auction", big deal and yes there isimage--------------BigE
    I'm glad I am a Tree
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    I guess it didn't occur to any of you that this seller may simply be trying to make a point about the registry?

    Russ, NCNE
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>This is no different than writing a book telling you how to build a bomb... >>



    I think it might be at least a little different.

    Russ, NCNE
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    Russ, you know what I mean...Giving instructions to someone how to break the law image

    So the consensus among the lawyers here is that there is nothing wrong with this...image

    Well, I have read numerous posts over the last several moths, where people are complaining about the POPs.
    Now, here is a prime example of why the problem exists and how it is getting worse!
  • Wow, just when you think you've seen everything, you see something like this that just about makes your jaw hit the floor! This is really a low, totally unethical practice. Like my dad used to say, "lower than whale crap on the ocean floor"...and that's about it!

    As a PCGS Club Member and Registry participant, I think this person should not be allowed to participate in any PCGS functions/clubs, if he even does I guess there's always a possibility that he's ignorant and just doesn't know any better...but I don't think so, since he knew exactly what he was saying, with regard to how someone could just use the cert. no. for a Registry set. It seems like people with no morals aways come up with new ways of being immoral!

    Tom Schiera
  • BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
    Well Russ, you don't set the town on fire to prove there is a lack of firemen, do you?------------------------BigE
    I'm glad I am a Tree
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Reading this thread one might get the impression that the registry is some sacrosanct institution besieged and set upon by legions of infidels. image

    Russ, NCNE
  • wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,979 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My 2 cents:

    1. I am not 100% sure inserts can even be sold. Somewhere I recall reading that the insert remains the property of PCGS? PCGS does pay $.50 for their safe return, but, the question remains whether that insert is PCGS' property.

    2. PCGS requires ownership of a COIN (in one fashion or another) before one can enter it in the Registry - even a 'right" to a coin may possibly permit entering it in a Registry set (e.g. someone agrees to buy a coin for $1,000 and pays $100 down and $100 per month - can one enter it in his registry set after making the first $100 payment? What about the 6th payment?) So, anyone registering a tag without some right to a coin appears to be clearly violating the Registry rules.

    Hopefully, PCGS can clarify all this - perhaps BOLD PRINT on the submission form stating that inserts remain the property of PCGS at all times? PCGS may want to check with its attorneys on the tag issue to come up with something to avoid the free sale of tags in the marketplace - or perhaps I am wrong and PCGS does not care if someone desires to sell a tag, or perhaps the submitter actually owns the insert tag at all times? Interesting issues.

    Wondercoin

    P.S. Another GA(p) in MS67 needs to come off the pop report!
    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • flykiteflykite Posts: 147
    ...taking this a step further, it would be cool to post a bogus set and see if one could complete it! Man,
    I wish I had all my inserts from the past 10 years! After all, pop. reports ARE soooo accurate....
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    OK, so I emailed the guy....

    Hi, As a member of PCGS and The PCGS Registry, I just wanted to know what the purpose of this auction might be. Are you tying to make a point, or, are you just trying to make some money. I don't get it.


    And here is his reply...
    <FONT size=2>
    Its the basic idea of eBay. Sell anything you don't want.
    </FONT>

    I guess he's not trying to make a point...image


    Edited...some day I'll figure this stuff out.

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    He cancelled the auction. Probably made a private deal and now the integrity of the registry is forever ruined. Maybe he traded it for bomb making plans. image

    Russ, NCNE
  • If a car dealer sells you a car and says, " You could run someone over and kill them with this car," and you run someone over and kill them, the car dealer has no liability. Everyone already knows it is illegal to run people over (excluding coin dealers, of course).

    Everyone also knows you can enter a cert number that you don't own into the registry. By making a big deal out of it this way, you are merely giving others the idea that maybe they can get away with it.
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭
    I'll bet the dog bought it.
  • ccrdragonccrdragon Posts: 2,697
    Nope - BJ removed the cert number from the database - it's now useless....
    Cecil
    Total Copper Nutcase - African, British Ships, Channel Islands!!!
    'Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup'
  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Good for BJ.....and Registry participants.......and anyone trying to rely on the pop reports as a guide.

    Deleting the cert # from the database is the easiest and surest way to thwart the conmen.

    Jim
    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    OK...I give up...

    Russ and bushmaster8, I hope you've enjoyed yourselves...

    Cecil, Thanks for your help. image

    Mitch, Ken and everyone else, thanks for your comments. I hope something good will come of this.
    I'm sorry if I ruffled anyone's feathers, but I still don't think it is right!


  • << <i>
    Deleting the cert # from the database is the easiest and surest way to thwart the conmen.

    Jim >>



    Yes, now no one can use THAT number. BUT, what about all the cert numbers "available" everywhere else? What is to stop a dishonest person from going to ebay, getting the cert numbers for an entire series, entering those numbers fraudulently into the registry and reaping the benefits( free gradings)? There is no "sure way" to thwart that, save requiring Registry participants to mail their actual slabs to PCGS for verification before accepting the set as valid.
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • NumisMeNumisMe Posts: 841 ✭✭
    OK everybody...I have been communicating with Brian Childs, the guy that ran the auction in question.
    He has told me his story, and although I do not agree with his methods, or his actions, I do understand his reasons.
    As Russ had suggested, he was trying to make a point, but he failed to point that out in our initial contact.
    After hearing his story, and viewing the image he sent me, I promised to post it here for all to see.
    Again, I still do not agree with what he did, but I do feel he had a valid reason...But read on...
    --------------------------------------------

    <FONT size=2>
    Dear PCGS Members and Collectors Alike,
    Many of you are aware that a PCGS MS67 1999-P Georgia Quarter insert was listed on eBay without the coin (#3918416428). I am the seller of this auction (brccoins). Obviously this has become a pretty controversial listing and I would like the further address it. There is more to the story than meets the eye. An MS67 1999-P Georgia quarter never at any point accompanied this cert #. Let me tell the story.
    It all started when I was sending a regular submission of 1999 quarters into PCGS to be graded. 95 quarters in total to be exact. Upon completion of the grades I had 14 MS67 quarters including one PCGS MS67 1999-P Georgia Quarter. Great, right? Wrong. When the coins arrived I was disappointed to find that my "MS67 Georgia-P" contained a Pennsylvania-P Quarter (Please see the picture). Many of you know that’s a difference of about $600.00.
    Like most people would be I was more than a little frustrated. I called PCGS and they were unwilling to help and were quite rude and defensive about the whole situation. All they wanted me to do was send it back at my expense so they could "fix it" by sticking a Pennsylvania label on it. I realize that some of you would have been fine with that and gone with it. But the way I see it they took me once and I wasn’t about to pay for fixing their mistake.
    Now here’s how the Pennsylvania was separated from the slab.
    Upon receiving my 95 coins on that submission I knew that many of them were grossly under graded. For those of you that don’t know PCGS isn’t exactly consistent with their grades. It has become a formality for me to crack open slabs and send them back unanimously for re-grading (and higher grades). I found a total of 18 of the 95 coins I thought deserved a higher grade and broke them open with a hammer as usual. All MS66’s or lower. Back to Newport Beach they went.
    I was planning on selling the mix-up coin just as it was. But after I broke these 18 coins open realized that the MS67 Georgia-Pennsylvania mistake was one of them. I didn’t mean to crack this one open. Thus I had just the Insert. I wanted to send PCGS a message with this auction. The MS67 Georgia never existed and that was all PCGS gave me so I was going to sell it for what it was. PCGS, not me made a "ghost" MS67 Georgia. You can take one off of the pop.
    Of the 18 coins I sent back (all MS66 or lower) 2 of them came back as MS67’s (SUB # 3143237). A MS67 Delaware-D and Georgia-P. I got my Georgia MS67. One can make pretty good money off of sending MS66’s and lower back to the grading room. It’s the sad truth. I realize they’re only human but they grade our coins so arbitrarily it’s not even funny. I’ve turned MS64’s into MS67’s. I’ve got my complete set of State Quarters in MS67’s and MS68’s only. But not one is in a PCGS slab. And I consider it the finest known…
    So why not sell just an insert!!!???
    I am not trying to discourage anyone from buying PCGS graded coins. I sell them. It’s about the only way to market high-end state quarters and turn it into a lucrative business. There is a degree of accuracy in the modern coins, but I firmly believe they pay more attention to older and more expensive dates. I have been a member of PCGS going on 4 years now. Since I was 16 years old (yes I’m only 20). And I have seen just about everything but the company’s stock go down in value. Turnaround times have become a joke. Its common knowledge that when demand rises in a business you hire more employees to compensate. In this case graders.
    For those of you I offended I sincerely apologize. I ended the auction at BJ’s request and no more Inserts will be listed on eBay. I have over 500 unique positive feedback on eBay (99.86%) and have done business with many of you. I’m just giving you all something to think about...
    Happy coin collecting! -Brian Childs
    ------------------------------</FONT>
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    I don't know who's funnier, the guy selling the cert or you guys. You make is sound as if there are no phantom coins in the registry.

    I think im gonna have a heartattack, first thing Steve has posted in years I agree with! image
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • The thing that really bothers me about some of the posts on this subject, is the way actions are justified. I am pretty much a black and white thinker. That is to say, it is right or it is wrong.
    If you have to write a paragraph or more to make a justification, or it is the letter of the law instead of the intent of the law, it just doesn't sit right with me.
    If you are angry with someone or a company, and feel you need to get back and get your satisfaction in an intended "I'll show you" manner, then the proposed answer is just as wrong as the original wrong.
    Real interesting to see the weasel wording of answers and the side of the fence folks lined up on.
    Dick
  • lavalava Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭
    That rather long and drawn out story, while interesting, does not justify the seller's conduct reflected in his ebay listing. It is a sympathetic story, but prisons are full of sympathetic stories (so too are the sidewalks).
    I brake for ear bars.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    This thread is hilarious. The auction has been compared to selling bomb making plans, reference was made to burning down a building, there's talk of prison. Sure, the selling of cert labels is wrong and using them in a registry set is unethical, but it's just a silly a piece of paper related to a game! It ain't Armageddon. image

    Russ, NCNE
  • clackamasclackamas Posts: 5,615
    Who cares, obviously no one has bid on it so no one else cares either.
  • Dan50Dan50 Posts: 1,816 ✭✭✭
    I am not a highly educated person, did not even finish high school But I did get my GED during free time while serving in the Army during the sixtys and seventys. So I cant compete with the fancy words, legal aspects, or the making of a point. But it seems to me one word can clear this question up. And while this does not refer to anyone on this board, I think it should be examined by the seller. No legal, or joking retort will ever tarnish it. You can't buy it, you can't sell it. Either you have it, or you don't. That word is integrity.
    Dan
Sign In or Register to comment.