Rumor or truth?
fivecents
Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
A dealer told me that the 1921-s walker has a higher value than the 1921-p in unc grades because alot of the 1921-s walkers had their mint marks removed (altered) to look like the higher value 1921-p. The 1921-s has almost double the mintage of the 1921-p.
0
Comments
Many 21-s' you find on the market are graded fairly loosely even in PCGS holders, also cleaned or lightly wiped. Finding a true original XF and better yet Au and higher is a real prize and expect to dish out some dough.
I recently bidded on a PCGS-50 21-s on e-bay. Nice original coin, but probably an Xf-48 to be honest. I placed a bid at 7700.00 and thought for sure Id get it, wrong, sold for 8950.00.
jim
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
PR69eagles...The price difference only changes in the upper grades.
Breen claims the same thing in his Complete Encyclopedia except with the "D" mintmark removed.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>...Why were the 1921-s walkers not as heavily saved in the upper grades as the 1921-p/d, did the collectors back in 1921 & 1922 know what the mintage figures were? >>
One thing to remember is that the population on the west coast was a much smaller percentage of the nations population back then than it is now, so most of the nations collectors lived on the east coast. The smaller nmber of west coast collectors meant a smaller number of rolls saved. And without the highway system that we have today the coins would have taken much longer to work their way east. By the time the halves reached the collectors in the east they would have significant wear.