1969 Topps Set - WOW!
Virtualizard
Posts: 1,936 ✭✭
Link
I'll start by saying - the winning bidder has one top notch collection. He bought my 1969 partial set and my 1970 near complete set about 9 months ago. Dave has accumulated one heck of a nice collection in a little under a year. Check out some of his sets.
JEB.
I'll start by saying - the winning bidder has one top notch collection. He bought my 1969 partial set and my 1970 near complete set about 9 months ago. Dave has accumulated one heck of a nice collection in a little under a year. Check out some of his sets.
JEB.
0
Comments
I've seen that Ebay id all over the place but i don't know who it is. I think he's even out bid me before (and when i place a snipe i usually win).
He does seem to be building an awesome collection very fast.
Paul.
No doubt about it.
Problem was the highest bidder other than he was at 13K and change.
He had to pay 20K to win it.
So really .........is he a winner or not??
At a little over 13 K he most likely was.
How about at 7 grand over his next highest bidder at 20K??
Thoughts.
Mojorob
JEB.
<< <i>Yea he won a beautiful set alright !!
No doubt about it.
Problem was the highest bidder other than he was at 13K and change.
He had to pay 20K to win it.
So really .........is he a winner or not??
At a little over 13 K he most likely was.
How about at 7 grand over his next highest bidder at 20K??
Thoughts.
Mojorob >>
Mojorob:
Numerous dealers list and sell items for fixed prices that may be very much higher than they would receive in an auction process. This set would not have sold for $20k, and it appears that the winning bidder was willing to go much higher. So I think it is a win-win situation.
If he wanted the set and was willing to pay $20K for it then he got a good deal. IMO people put WAY to much stock in what Beckett or the SMR says an item is worth. If the SMR had said this set was worth $5K and he paid $20K then he still got a good deal in my eyes if he's happy with the purchase and was willing to pay $20K.
Price guides are evil!
Paul.
SMR on a average PSA 8 set is not 5K
I never said the SMR price was $5k, i said "IF" the guide price was $5k it would still have been a good deal at $20k if the buyer was happy with the transactiuon.
Paul.
Just because you are willing to pay 7 grand more than anyone else at a particular time does
not mean you are neccessarily getting a good deal.
If he can't turn around and get his money back out of it, the same way he bought it, it is
not particularly a good deal.
It may be a deal the buyer is very happy with, and that is absolutly great...... but I would not classify it as the buyer
getting a good deal in this instance.
However a final note, I wish this set were mine!!
GREAT SET and a very nice addition, all DEALS aside.
Mojorob
If a really hot girl that he wanted to date told him "I'll date you if you get a complete 1969 Topps set with a GPA of 7 or higher", then he got a great deal.
I have about $11.5K in my 1969 collection (not including shipping and insurance) and while the GPA is higher (8.36), I am far from complete (54%) and missing many low pop cards. I think he did just fine. And on the bright side...he probably will not be bidding on so many 1969 cards now.
Sandy
You make a good point. I'm 35% complete and have $10000 in mine. I do have most of the tough ones though. My GPA is 8.59. I personally believe the winner got a deal at 20K.