puckheads and c56 imp tobacco collectors, please read:
coachvinny
Posts: 634 ✭
check out the dunderdale and bernier cards currently on ebay
( would some knowledgable person please reply with the links ).
how in the h*ll are those 2 cards psa 4's nq? one has a bleed thru stain
and the other has some ugly paper loss. wtf!
when i compare my the 4's and 5's in my set registry,
i can't help but wonder if i'm wasting my time and resources on psa
grading. if those cards are 4's , than maybe i should X over mine
into 7's and 8's.
pathetic work psa!
( would some knowledgable person please reply with the links ).
how in the h*ll are those 2 cards psa 4's nq? one has a bleed thru stain
and the other has some ugly paper loss. wtf!
when i compare my the 4's and 5's in my set registry,
i can't help but wonder if i'm wasting my time and resources on psa
grading. if those cards are 4's , than maybe i should X over mine
into 7's and 8's.
pathetic work psa!
i ain't often right
but I've never been wrong
it seldom turns out the way
it does in the song
once in a while
you get shown the light
in the strangest of places
if you look at it right
but I've never been wrong
it seldom turns out the way
it does in the song
once in a while
you get shown the light
in the strangest of places
if you look at it right
0
Comments
Are those your cards that Neil is listing for you ?
Randy
Hockey set! Always looking to buy, trade or upgrade 1966 Topps to 1969 OPC.
<< <i>PSA mainly looks at the corners and centering The only real time the surface has anything to do with the grade is when there is a wrinkle or crease. From the Big three graders (BVG SGC PSA) BVG (OR BGS?) takes the surface into consideration. >>
You can't be serious...of course PSA takes into consideration such surface issues like paper loss, focus, printing, scratches, etc,. These are all issues PSA considers when assigning a grade to a card.
Here's PSA grading standards from grades 4, 3, 2, and 1.
VG-EX 4: Very Good-Excellent.
Corners may be slightly rounded. Surface wear is noticeable but modest. May have light scuffing or light scratches. Some original gloss will be retained. Borders may be slightly off-white. A light crease may be visible. Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back.
VG 3: Very Good.
A PSA VG 3 card reveals some rounding of the corners, though not extreme. Some surface wear will be apparent, along with possible light scuffing or light scratches. Focus may be somewhat off-register and edges may exhibit noticeable wear. Much, but not all, of the card's original gloss will be lost. Borders may be somewhat yellowed and/or discolored. A crease may be visible. Printing defects are possible. Slight stain may show on obverse and wax staining on reverse may be more prominent. Centering must be 90/10 or better on the front and back.
GOOD 2: Good.
A PSA Good 2 card's corners show accelerated rounding and surface wear is starting to become obvious. A good card may have scratching, scuffing, light staining, or chipping of enamel on obverse. There may be several creases. Original gloss may be completely absent. Card may show considerable discoloration. Centering must be 90/10 or better on the front and back.
PR-FR 1: Poor to Fair.
A PSA PR-FR 1 card's corners will show extreme wear, possibly affecting framing of picture. Surface of card will show advanced stages of wear, including scuffing, scratching, pitting, chipping and staining. Picture will possibly be quite out of register and borders may have become brown and dirty. May have one or more heavy creases. A Poor card may be missing one or more small pieces, have major creasing and extreme discoloration or dirtiness throughout. Card may show noticeable warping. Centering must be 90/10 or better on the front and back.
Silver Coins
e-bay ID: grilloj39
e-mail: grilloj39@gmail.com
<< <i>PSA mainly looks at the corners and centering The only real time the surface has anything to do with the grade is when there is a wrinkle or crease. From the Big three graders (BVG SGC PSA) BVG (OR BGS?) takes the surface into consideration. >>
I disagree. I've submitted the Russell in my set, which will soon give way to a PSA 5, twice only to get hammered with a 2 both times. I've never been able to spot anything flagrantly wrong with it other than a modest amount of what I'm assuming is glue-related discoloration on back. It certainly looks better than the staining on the Dunderdale.
On the other issue, I don't think PSA is real consistent with paper loss. I'd say they're typically harder on it than SGC, but I haven't noticed any distinct grading pattern based on degree of paper loss.
An apology is fine by me nothing extra is needed
Thanks
Randy
<< <i>Ylder
An apology is fine by me nothing extra is needed
Thanks
Randy >>
What was the problem that I caused again? I sent the cards out extremely late?
Dunderdale C56
Bernier
The stain on the Dunderdale, even if the rest of the card is perfect should not get it anything more than a 2.
The paper loss on the Bernier might be a printing problem. I have seen a couple, including a C56 Russell EXMT 6 I own that has a similar (though far smaller) printing flaw and not a paper loss. Still that is an awfully big oversight.
55-56 quaker oats sets. i have 2 c56s ( decary and glass ) and 2 quaker oats (
geoffrion and talbot ) at psa now. based on the dunderdale and the bernier on
ebay now, they should come back 7's or 8's. yeah, in my dreams.
when they come back ( should be early next week ), i will be selling them off
as well as the other cards listed in my set registries. included will be a 55-56 jacques
plante rc # 50 Quaker Oats psa 5 which i never listed in the registry.
i will post all cards i'm selling on the vintage board next week, then if necessary
on ebay.
but I've never been wrong
it seldom turns out the way
it does in the song
once in a while
you get shown the light
in the strangest of places
if you look at it right
PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE?
an offer would be appreciated
vinny
but I've never been wrong
it seldom turns out the way
it does in the song
once in a while
you get shown the light
in the strangest of places
if you look at it right
Also, I didn't think my Russell was that spectacular, but I definitely thought a 3 at worst with a reasonable shot at a 4. Speaking of it, I'll send you a scan Will or you can still see it in my set.
Lastly, if you're serious Vinny, I'll drop you a line a little later.
I would pay you well for them
PM sent. E-mail me at raydbonz@aol.com if you would be so kind.
Thanks,
Bill
Hopefully you can talk him out of that Plante card- I know you've had your eye on it for on a while. Wouldn't it be the irony of ironies if that card went to Ylder instead?