1971-72 OPC Hockey Grade Weights
Browntoni
Posts: 184
Why are all the cards in this set weighted the same? Is it a lack of interest? I would expect that the Dryden rookie card would be weighted the highest, followed by the Lafleur and Dionne rookies and the large number of HOFers. Also, what about the checklists? Any thoughts?
Always buying high grade Mike Schmidt and Steve Carlton cards!!!
0
Comments
Hockey set! Always looking to buy, trade or upgrade 1966 Topps to 1969 OPC.
With the 71-72 set there is zero competition Teemu and ADSL both have complete sets that they are grading at their leisure . Myself and Darren are working together to complete are sets. So the set hasn't been weighted simply because no one has taken the time to do it.
In terms of value the 111 checklist should be #1 followed by , Dryden , Lafleur , Dionne , Checklist 264 , Orr #100. With that being said i paid slightly more for my Orr 100 than the Dionne Rookie but not much more
Randy
I am just waiting to see how much the weight the Orr rookie in the 1966 set.
bobby