The W&M Halfcrown was a nice surprize

I this in the mail Friday along with James II 6d and another halfcrown. Text The George II sucked but the W&M
has incredible eye appeal for a coin of this grade. All the darker areas are nice colors with the reverse
being very colorful. The rev. has a yellow and orange tone around rims and covering crown while the
shield is a mixture of blue and green with just a little yellow.
It does have some hairlines in the reverse
fields but overall nice for the grade.
has incredible eye appeal for a coin of this grade. All the darker areas are nice colors with the reverse
being very colorful. The rev. has a yellow and orange tone around rims and covering crown while the
shield is a mixture of blue and green with just a little yellow.

fields but overall nice for the grade.
0
Comments
I guess I am not following you on this... did the James II suck? I don't see a reference to a George II coin. I am sorry about the James II because the pictures looked great.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
The James II was pretty nice. There are a few minor rim problems but the strike and overall
eye appeal make up for it.
I'm sending back and getting a Cnut.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
with this dealer, I'm sure just a mistake.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>And as for those George II old head portraits, they are not as easy to get as everyone thinks in high circ grade. >>
I think you mean the young head ones are hard to get in top grade, no? I though the old head coins were the easiest to get because they are in far lower relief.
Sylvester.
The problem I see with the George old head potrait is the strike... the center hair is not often complete. Finding them well struck is a challenge and grading these coins in the EF and GEF range is tough because it can be hard to distinguish wear from a weak strike.
As for George II young heads in EF...they are just plain rare...end of discussion. You are clearly right about the high relief of the young heads and that makes high end circs impossible to find...I do enjoy the hunt. BTW, nice additions with the two George II sixpence
.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>Sylvestius:
The problem I see with the George old head potrait is the strike... the center hair is not often complete. Finding them well struck is a challenge and grading these coins in the EF and GEF range is tough because it can be hard to distinguish wear from a weak strike.
As for George II young heads in EF...they are just plain rare...end of discussion. You are clearly right about the high relief of the young heads and that makes high end circs impossible to find...I do enjoy the hunt. BTW, nice additions with the two George II sixpence
. >>
Actually you are right about that curl on the old head issue, it's never fully struck is it! Even on my AU 1750 6d it still looks weak. I'd be hard pushed to tell the difference between weak strike and wear on that little bit of area.
And the yound head stuff really is nice in top condition but it's very rare you see it. I do have a slighty higher grade YH sixpence lying around, over half of the eye is visible!
Cheers for the comments on the other two!