Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

certfied autographs question

Do you guys think that in the future there will be a premium paid for cards that have the auto on the card itself versus cards that have a sticker with the auto.?
"Women should be obscene and not heard. "
Groucho Marx

Comments

  • I have a '97 NBA at 50 Topps George Mikan certified on his '48 Bowman reprint that is signed directly on the card and other certified issues that are signed on a sticker or designated area on the cards. I personally don't think either one will sell for a premium. I think it depends more on the players signature rather than whether it is on the card or on a sticker. Especially if the player adds something extra to a few of the signatures (adding "HOF" to a few for instance). If I am not mistaken, Joe Namath made a mistake on one of his certified sig cards and wrote the word "oops" in small letters after the sig. I think that one sold for a premium. image
    Registry Sets:
    T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
    1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
    1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
    1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
    1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
    1981 Topps FB PSA 10
    1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
    1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
    3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up

    My Sets
  • joker73joker73 Posts: 497
    Yes, absolutely, for several reasons. First, band-aid autos are just plain ugly, even some of the better ones like Contenders. Also, dual auto cards with band-aids aren't nearly as interesting to me as knowing both players held the actual card they signed in their hands (as opposed to a card company just slapping a couple of stickers on whatever new rare insert card they are creating, without the players ever actually seeing the card itself). Finally, while band-aid autos generally are still "certified," I've developed a strong preference for Topps autos issued since 2000 because of the numbered hologram on the back. They are the only brand with this feature, and especially for high-end autos that are often forged (Marino, Elway, etc.), I have to think that long-term such cards will command a premium of some sort.

    In the end, though, the deciding factor for me remains aesthetic - nothing beats a clear, crisp auto on a well-designed card (the 2001 Archives Rookie Reprint autos are a great example).

    Robert
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    I agree with Robert, and while the sticker autos that playoff has put out have made them able
    to load up some products and to avoid redemptions, the autos that topps put out have to be
    the nicest. Heritage comes to mind, also worthy of note are Topps Archives, Fan Favorites, and
    Topps Retired (encased but still signed on the card).

    Topps is also able to make many of their rookie releases have the auto on the actual card like the
    wildly popular bowman chrome and bc draft. I think playoff does try to make their cards look
    nice despite the sticker, UD and Fleer do poor jobs. Some of these ugliest cards I have seen
    have come from them and we all know that UD is the most expensive.

    I think there will be a significant premium in years to come on these cards. I think dual sigs will
    be worth more to. The topps co-signers is an excellent set. Too bad topps doesn't do stadium
    club anymore. UD has a nice idea in sweetspot, but look to discontinue that brand too.

    JS
  • shouldabeena10shouldabeena10 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭
    short answer..... "Yes"

    I think it's already starting to show in some sets.

    Mike
    "Vintage Football Cards" A private Facebook Group of 4000 members, for vintage football card trading, sales & auctions. https://facebook.com/groups/vintagefootball/
  • calleochocalleocho Posts: 1,569 ✭✭
    Good replies!

    thanks a lot.
    "Women should be obscene and not heard. "
    Groucho Marx
Sign In or Register to comment.