Home U.S. Coin Forum

For your enjoyment: A couple of cooked Morgans

I received a large lot of Morgans to sell today from a friend and fellow board member. Included were a few raw Morgans. Unfortunately, two of them, the ones I am posting here, are artificially toned. Can you see why they are AT?

image
image

Comments

  • Hello, oh great Morgan guru! image

    1. The 1881-S looks AT due to all the splotching of the colors.
    2. The 1885 looks AT because the colors -- especially on the reverse -- don't seem to transition gracefully. It looks like someone lit a match to the reverse.
    Author of MrKelso's official cheat thread words of wisdom on 5/30/04. image
    imageimage
    Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I just know they are Nasty Nasty, fingerprints too. And definitely not an original look or color.
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • Ummmmmmm... Burn marks?
    ~Richard Dorrance
  • ibzman350ibzman350 Posts: 5,315
    Don't have any guess for the first coin...the second I'm thinking some type of fluid or chemical.


    Herb
    Remember it's not how you pick your nose that matters, it's where you put the boogers.
    imageimageimage
  • poorguypoorguy Posts: 4,317
    #1 looks like it has been cooked. The brownish maroon colors in splotchy ugliness give it away.

    #2 looks like it has been campfire cooked. A match made that blue streak on the back. IMO.
    Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com
  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,793 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I received a large lot of Morgans to sell today from a friend and fellow board member. Included were a few raw Morgans. Unfortunately, two of them, the ones I am posting here, are artificially toned. Can you see why they are AT? >>


    Eric: To clarify your question for this thread, are you asking us:

    1) What was the motivation for someone to articficially tone them (i.e. to cover up problems)?
    2) What are the diagnostics to determine that they have been artificially toned? (i.e sharp color transitions rather than gradual)
    3) What procedure was used to "cook" them?
    4) Or, all of the above?

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • GoldfingerGoldfinger Posts: 319 ✭✭
    These just look bad. I really can't tell "good" AT from NT (but, then, neither can many experts), but these are obvious.

    Natural toning is part of the coin, rather than something ON the coin. The toning here sits on the surface, separate from the coin, obscuring the lustre, especially on the 81-S.

    Taken by itself, the obverse of the 1885 almost looks as if it could be natural, but for the spots and unnatural breaks. The dark spot at 3:00 on the obverse looks burned. The lustre comes through the toning, but not as it does on the portion of the obverse that is not toned.

    small_d

    e-mail me here

    WINNER:
    POTD 8-30-05 (awarded by dthigpen)
    POTD 9-8-05 (awarded by gsaguy)
    GSAGUY Slam 12-10-04

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file