Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Restore or not restore ?

Many recent threads have made we wonder about something ?

Would many of us try to restore a card if the value was there ?

Lets say you find a 54 Aaron at a garage sale, it's taped to an album page with a dozen or so other 54s, all commons. The seller knows little and wants $ 25.00, because he's not a total fool and realizes even a damaged older card might be worth somethig.

After bringing them home you notice the Aaron is quite nice in all aspects, at least a 7 probably an 8 , except for the scotch tape across its front. Corners, gloss, Etc. look very nice.

Would you spend fifty bucks or whatever the rate is, and send to a " card doctor " with a chance of submitting later for a possible 8 ???

I can not honestly say I am not absolutely sure I would not. What is the feeling out there ???

image
This aint no party,... this aint no disco,.. this aint no fooling around.

Comments

  • TipemTipem Posts: 881



    Jaxxr,


    Having been burned on too many high dollar trimmed cards and knowing what that feels like,I would have to say that I would not send it off to a card doctor. I do appreciate your open honesty in stating that you truly are not sure what you would do.

    Vic
    Please be kind to me. Even though I'm now a former postal employee, I'm still capable of snapping at any time.
  • AlanAllenAlanAllen Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭
    Not just no, but h*ll no.
    No such details will spoil my plans...
  • KING KELLOGGKING KELLOGG Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭
    I'm with AlanAllen...

    ......................h*ll NO....

    Submit it with the tape...get a 3 or 4, still worth $25............



    Larry
    I LOVE FANCY CURRENCY, pretty girls, Disney Dollars, pretty girls, MPC's, ..did I mention pretty girls???

    email....emards4457@msn.com


    CHEERS!!
  • jaxxrjaxxr Posts: 1,258 ✭✭
    I hate to keep harping on, or making a bigger bore of myself than I probably already have, however...

    Lets go back to the Aaron card with tape across the front. Same senario, except you decide to try to remove the tape yourself. The card's in nice shape except for the 50 year old clear tape holding it to an album page.

    You might use a hair-dryer, or a microwave, or nothing at all, to increase the chances of the tape coming off clean. After the cautious and careful pull, amazing......the tape has dried, deteriorated, decomposed, mummyfied, or whatever, enough to come off with nary a trace of adhesive material left on the card,

    Send off to PSA, get back a 7 or an 8, and after a few months, you decide you don't wish to keep it anymore and will sell on ebay.

    Will you state something like this in your ad copy ?? " Card once had a foreign substance which was removed by the collector, not sent to a professional card doctor for this removal "

    Is this card altered ? Is is not altered because the tape was removed by a collector ? If a professional had removed the tape is it now unethical ?

    I don't profess to fully understand the line between ethical and unethical in these now being talked about "restoration" threads. I am sure any ADDED substances are truly wrong and therefore unethical, but does removal of a non-factory made, outside substance always produce unethical behavior ?? Or does it depend on who is the remover ??

    I sincerely wish to hear others views on this potentialy increasing situation of "restoration" and its impact on the hobby.

    image
    This aint no party,... this aint no disco,.. this aint no fooling around.
  • BasiloneBasilone Posts: 2,492 ✭✭

    I think pulling off tape on the back of a card is one thing.......bleaching borders is quite another.
  • shouldabeena10shouldabeena10 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭
    There will always be fine lines here ... that are different for each person. But I'd say 2 good general rules of thumb should be:

    1) If it feels unethical to you when your doing it, then it probably is.

    2) If you found out that (x) was performed on card you purchased.... would you be upset at the seller for not disclosing it?


    Mike


    "Vintage Football Cards" A private Facebook Group of 4000 members, for vintage football card trading, sales & auctions. https://facebook.com/groups/vintagefootball/
  • Good point Mike - if you think about anything that you do, and if your actions could be deemed "questionable" by others in the hobby, life, business, etc etc etc, then you probably should not be doing whatever it is that you are thinking about doing.

    Back to the original point....I think everyone is human, we all have feelings, needs, and desires, and I think ANYONE could be caught at a weak moment in life (ethically, spiritually, mentally) and be compelled to participate in some type of questionable activity, including our issue of card restoration.

    Just my opinion

    Dal



  • ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    In your above example, I am not sure many collectors would mention that the card once had tape on it (I probably would, but that's just me), and that it was removed cleanly. The straight, unqualified 7 or 8 that would result from the clean removal...many collectors would say that speaks for itself. If there was an ST qualifier (or something similar), I would definitely explain the reason why it was there, to the best of my knowledge.

    Professional "restoration" of cards...absolutely no way.
    image
  • Tape? So, does removing wax from a card also constitute "restoration?" I wonder how many amateur restorers we have in our midst! image

    Scott
  • My wife and I have been talking about this "restoration" issue (she is not a baseball card collector...and doesn't really appreciate my doing so...I mention this because her viewpoint is not tainted with any underlying purpose)...she see's nothing wrong with restoring a card...as long as the "integrity" of the card is not disturbed...she collects antique (many of which have been restored to their original condition)...she does not think that "trimming" or touching up color is correct...however removing glue, gum-stains even wrinkles or creases does not alter the intergrity of the card...the card is not been changed from it's original purpose...I tried to explain the problem as best as I could...and yet after the conversation I had to admit she made some good points...her basic tenet was that as long as the card original "integrity" had not been altered she could not find any fault with restoration...she gave me a few examples...like museum quality art that had been restored...even my Austin Healey has been restored...the Sistine Chapel paints of Michelangelo have been restored...all of these are still extremely valuable and considered original pieces...they have not been altered but repaired...

    I explained to her that I agree however none of these are now considered "mint"...never having been touched...still original...and that the "originality" in cards is what gives them value...

    Okay...does she have a point?
    Henri
    Collector
    Topps 58,59,60,61,62,63,64 Sets
    Fleer 60, 61-62 Sets
  • CON40CON40 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭
    Henri;

    Good postulation here! I agree that restoring Austin Healey's with as many original parts as you can muster is ok (don't play with those serial numbers though -- if the AH has them) because cars require maintenance and parts replacement from day one. Anything that is accepted as authentic despite occasional need for repair is one thing (antique homes, cars, paintings, boats, etc. I think is generally seen as ok, because the alternative would be nothing but piles of scrap suitable for salvage. These types of these are ravaged by age, nature, the elements, use, movement, and so forth.

    But, baseball cards are different... these are not normally subjected to these same ravages, therefore it is possible to keep them in a near original state for long periods of time... if card restoration were to come out of the closet (I know it's in their now!)... the only method of restoration I could condone would be brightening the stock. Paper yellows with age due to acid in the paper... nothing can stop that, so if someone devised a method to halt that process only I could live with it. Anyhting else that happens to a baseball card is a result of handling (or mishandling)... that very handling is what makes the pristine copies so desirable!

    If we could restore vintage cards to pristine condition, that would kill the value of existing (naturally occurring) pristine cards. How would you feel if you owned the 1/1 Topps 52 Andy Pafko for a cost of $85,000 or any other very rare, condition sensitive high dollar card only to have 6 more Pafko PSA 10s pop onto the market from Dr. Towle's lab and MW's shop? This would ruin the hobby in the long run!


  • << <i>There will always be fine lines here ... that are different for each person. But I'd say 2 good general rules of thumb should be:

    1) If it feels unethical to you when your doing it, then it probably is.

    2) If you found out that (x) was performed on card you purchased.... would you be upset at the seller for not disclosing it?


    Mike >>



    Excellent post Mike - could not have said it better myself. Just like when we were little we were taught the golden rule and it still applies today.
    "Why is it that Superman could stop a bullet with his chest, yet he ducked when somebody threw a chair at him?"
    "
    " Go ahead and get your fancy barely visible cell phones that get the internet, play DVD's, and can speak 5 languages. As for me and my Atari cell phone it works, it weighs 7 pounds, it is 14 inches long, and it looks like I could call in an airstrike from a remote desert it is so large!"
Sign In or Register to comment.