Read 'em and weep. Not everyone is unhappy with their grades!

PSARich

A lot of moaning out there it seems...always blamed on that "grader of death." Here's my last submission from from the 1970's special that I got back a couple weeks ago. This was the 4th or 5th time I have sent in 1972's and 1974's from a vending purchase and have always had great results, usually over 90% 9's with a few 10's mixed in. I confess I throughly evaluate these cards under light and magnification before submitting. There is hope out there for good grades, soooo....read 'em and weep!

Submission # 4097066
Zip 48603

qualitycards

PSARICH - Sweet! More often then not the cards get the grades they deserve. When I eyeball a card and think it should get an "8" and I receive a lower grade, I then notice while encapsulated that there was a wrinkle or another problem that I didn't spot. We hear enough about the Grader Of Death, its nice to know that some submitters are happy too!...jay
PSARICH's submission link...

CON40

psarich;

Nice submission... you obviously have a good eye for judging the condition of your cards! Nice job!

Robby

PsaRich ,............Just wondering if the cert. numbers on your submission began with the 11.........which according to another thread is suppose to be the Grader of Death certs. number???? Nice submission ! Congrats !............Robbie

koby

Great invoice. You have a very good eye for grading. Hopefully the Grader of Death does not read this and seek revenge on your next submission.

Cubfan

Sent on the 6th business day too. Good work!!

murcerfan

For the last time.............
the cert # has absolutely nothing to do with who graded any given card (unless it is 00000001)

It is also very doubtful that the notorious head grader (aka Darth) is looking at 1972 commmons sent in for $5 a pop.

that said, congrats.

scottsusor

As far as I've been able to tell, the folks (like me, for example) that have felt pinched on grading lately have complained about cards from the 1960's. I don't know if different graders get the 1960's cards or what, but there haven't been nearly as many folks disappointed with grades on 1970's cards (also me, for example).

Scott

PSARich

Thanks for your encouragement about my "good eye.".. Actually, the submission arrived two weeks before it was logged in and then graded about a week later. The 1973 Robinson that came back "evidence of trimming" was actually popped out of a SGC 96 holder. It looked so good I thought maybe a "10" was a possibility. Gambled and lost on that one. The 1974 Topps #645 Boswell is the only 9 graded with no 10's. It's on ebay as I write. And please, don't wish the "Grader of Death" on me!

tbub

WOW where did you find the raw to submit?

ctsoxfan

Excellent job on this submission. I would have been quite satisfied with it myself! Is the 1974 Schmidt 9 available?

Basilone

Great Job !! That is a heck of an invoice !!!

treadway1

PSA Rich - excellent work - question on the 8's recvd - do you think truly belong as 8's on the whole or do u think was PSA just reluctant to give 9's across the board? I have always wondered on some of my submissions that grade largely 9's whether the 8's I receive are more lets say "quota" related. When I re-review the 8's still have a difficult time by and large differentiating 8s and 9s

ED
(treadway1)


p.s. PSA Rich if you are ever interested in moving some your 67's - I am definitely interested