Loupes and microscopes
GoldCoinLover
Posts: 1,244
I have a 10x loupe for grading. What type of high powered loupe or microscope (Which one is better) should I use to detect well counterfeited (transfer die) method coins? What X should I use? I was thinking a 50x super powered loupe or 50x microscope. I used a 20x microscope today and I don't think its powerful enough. (For example to see the toolmarks on the famous high-relief Staint Gaudens coin in the rays or the greek Omega symbol in the eagles claw)
Also could someone give me a good website for a good high powered loupe/microscope? I want to buy one to detect counterfeit coins. (With my offical PCGS Guide to Counterfeit detection book)
Also could someone give me a good website for a good high powered loupe/microscope? I want to buy one to detect counterfeit coins. (With my offical PCGS Guide to Counterfeit detection book)
0
Comments
If you are more comfortable with the higher power loupe, I would at least suggest that when you first examine a coin, you do so without using the glass. Get a feel for the big picture first.
<< <i>I use a 5x loupe for grading (anything more seems to be excessive, at least for me), and couterfeit detection, and yes couterfeits are out there- just look, for example, at raw gold, you'll find it. I also have a 10x and a 20x loupe that I use for some counterfeit detection, altered dates, mint marks, etc. I also use these for variety identificatiion. I rarely use the 20x loupe. >>
I"m worried that a good gold coin (Counterfeit) will hit me. One made from the transfer die method. Could I see the small tooling marks the coin with a 10x? Or the omega symbol on some counterfeit coins? I Just think in order to detect counterfeit coins you need to be able to see tooling marks well, and with a 10x I don't think it's that easy to.
The tool marks, etc. may be easier to see with a 10x. The PCGS book has great descriptions and pics of what to look for. The information in the book will make more sense, and be more useful after you see a real example of what the book is trying to show. I think once you see your first counterfeit, it will be easier to spot more. However, keep in mind that some counterfeits are easier to recognize than others- some are very, very deceptive.
Greg
Meiji EMZ5-TR, 7-45x magification and a third eye for camera attachment.
Would highly recommend this. Nikon stereoscopes are excellent as well, if not superior.
I currently use a halogen ringlight, but single-bulb lightsources are more effective in checking for hairlines, etc.
<< <i>Also is are the people at ANACS well trained to spot counterfeits? I know this may sound silly but many people don't regard ANACS as high as PCGS or NGC. I recently sent in my gold coin to ANACS and is it safe to say they are right it's geniune? >>
You can bet on ANACS being right. They can tell good gold fom bad.
So quit worrying. Your coin is a genuine 1913 sovereign with "whittlemarks".
Ray
I'll go on Ebay and order a good one for counterfeit detection once I find what to buy. I really could use your guys help. Thanks
2nd Pass, 5x Glass to get a better look at the hits and focal areas and other things that caught my eye...
3rd Pass, 10x for things I want to get a really close look at, like the Mint Mark or the bands on a Merc, but the 3rd Pass usually ends up being the 5x to go over the coin again...
42/92
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=34084&item=4105513182&rd=1link
<< <i>Also is are the people at ANACS well trained to spot counterfeits? I know this may sound silly but many people don't regard ANACS as high as PCGS or NGC. I recently sent in my gold coin to ANACS and is it safe to say they are right it's geniune? >>
ANACS is tops with counterfeit detection. My initial impression is that they are better at discovering new counterfeits than other TPG's. Perhaps that is because they are more visible with there service at shows and they give many counterfeit detection seminars. All the major TPG's are equal at detecting known counterfeits, from my experience.
Lane
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
I use a 14x B&L Hastings triplet for spotting those hard to view varieties.
I use a Zeiss zoom stereoscope when I can (7x to 40x) as I prefer the depth of field and "3-D" image as compared with a loupe.
You should be able to detect most deceptive counterfeits with no more than a 14x loupe, with a little experience. But, a stereoscope is always a better tool . . . although they ain't cheap!
Lane
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>Should I get a 30x loupe or 30x pocket microscope? The pocket microscopes sure look cheap, especially the ones on ebay >>
Try them before you buy one. I have used the 30x pocket microscope in the past at it was a PAIN and the optics were not good. I have never seen a 30x loupe but I imagine that the field of vision is miniscule and unless it is a Hastings triplet, you will likely have distortions of the image near the edge of the field.
Lane
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces