Home U.S. Coin Forum

It's new Barber day!! Comments please on my 1900 NGC MS65 quarter (edit - new pic added)

My images aren't the greatest, but please let me know what you think. If I wanted this to cross to PCGS, would it get there? The toning is gorgeous and the luster is even better. I love this coin!


image

image

Comments

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If I wanted this to cross to PCGS, would it get there? >>



    Man, that's tough to answer based on the images provided, but I'm going to have to go with a "no". It doesn't appear to have the natural lustrous skin that PCGS likes for the gem grade.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,523 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Casey - What's your home address, and where do you hide your collection!

    I LOVE IT !!! image

    Dave

    P.S. It think it would cross.
    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭
    Casey I love it!

    btw, do you really care what plastic that is in?
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Who knows if it would cross. Why worry about it? In the end it is the coin that will sell itself.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • don't cross.this is a respectible piece deserving of the grade,without regard to toning.but will probably cross with original surface you describe,but why spend $
  • CaseyCasey Posts: 1,502 ✭✭
    Russ, my images pale to what this coin really looks like. The luster is awesome. I have no plans to try to cross it, but was just curious to see what the opinions would be.
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    I have been negetive today on Barber Coins but I like this one.

    Give you a jelly donut for it.image
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • ARCOARCO Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a Barber with character. I am sure the scan is hiding much of the underlying luster. I like it a lot.

    Tyler
  • MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭
    Its a solid 65, and if they ( ie: PCGS) don't cross it, it'll come back just as nice as you sent it in.

    Go for it.

    I know I would.

    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • TrimeTrime Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭
    Lots must be hidden in the photo which comes off dull and lifeless. Please give the picture another go to show the "true merits" of this coin.
    Trime
  • CaseyCasey Posts: 1,502 ✭✭
    Thanks for the comments everyone. Another image is below which I think is slightly better, but still not good enough. As many of you know, taking good pictures is extremely difficult and I'm still learning. I picked up this beauty from the fine folks at Pinnacle and it is now the number one favorite in the collection. I mostly collect in the higher circulated grades but decided I needed one gem Barber with nice color that knocked my socks off. This does that for me!

    image
  • I like it no matter what slab its in. Nice and clean.
    image
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    detailed pm sent to you

    michael
  • Splendid... and it would easily cross, based on what I see
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    xlnt coin. crack it out, & leave it out. you'll enjoy it so much more!

    K S
  • BigGreekBigGreek Posts: 1,090
    I love MS Barber coinage. Even wrapped in plastic. Unless you are working on a registry
    set or trying to sell it, don't send it to PCGS. It's already in a good holder. Can't tell from
    the picture if it would cross but it looks a little dull.
    image
    Please check out my eBay auctions!
    My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
  • jomjom Posts: 3,440 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Casey: My guess is that your first picture was with a flourecent lamp and the second was with a regular old incandecent.

    Flourecent gives the coin a bluish cast and doesn't show luster. Note the holder color.
    Incandecent gives the coin a reddish cast but gives luster. Again, note the holder color.

    That about right? Now try some natural light instead....it should give better results. Also, consider an OTT lamp (swirl type)...works for me. Also, note you will have difficulty with the NGC slab. It screws up the iris on the camera because it reflects as white. I like to use a black background so PCGS slabs works a bit better.

    Nice coin!

    jom
  • CaseyCasey Posts: 1,502 ✭✭
    jom, you're very close. Two different light sources were used in addition to me playing with the white balance and other options on my Nikon Coolpix. I still can't use it properly but I think I'm making some progress. Natural light is next when I get some time.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    The second image shows the luster much better. image

    Russ, NCNE

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file