The criteria for a 1955-D Washington Quarter....

Boom

Is the criteria for 55-D Washies to attain the PCGS 66 grade different from all the rest of the series?

Anybody know for sure? I've seen the kind that look like they had a bad rinse at the Mint....

(too "chromy") and then the kind that look "normal"... deserving of the 66 designation,

however the emphasis on this particular date and mint mark seems to be Mint set toning.

Any input, opinions or expertise? Thanks

MrEureka

There's no way in the world that anyone sitting in the grading room would ever think for a moment that a 55-D quarter should be graded differently than any other Washington quarter.

Boom

I'd like to believe that Andy, I really would.

stman

They're all out to get you Boom.

Boom

UH-uh...not me. I haven't sent any in yet! I have a 64 that is gorgeous, a 65 that's

nice and now a 66 because it has toning on it! I don't get it. I haven't worked up

the nerve to send in a roll yet!

darktone

<< <i>however the emphasis on this particular date and mint mark seems to be Mint set toning. >>

is there an attactively toned 55 mint set coin out there? mike

MadMonk

<< <i>

<< <i>however the emphasis on this particular date and mint mark seems to be Mint set toning. >>

is there an attactively toned 55 mint set coin out there? mike >>



Yes there is! And I have about 3 to 5 of them! (cha-ching!!!)

Boom

Cha-ching -badda-bing...submit em and let's see if they come back 66 Let me know-OK?

darktone

<< <i>Yes there is! And I have about 3 to 5 of them! (cha-ching!!!) >>

lets see some pictures! mike