Home U.S. Coin Forum

Artificial Toning. How can you tell?

How do you differentiate between normal toning and artificial? Especially if there are colors rather than the grey oxides?
Honesty is the Best Policy!

Comments

  • Coins that exhibit spotted toning, regardless of color, are most likely artificially produced.
    J.Kriek
    Morgan Dollar Aficionado & Vammer
    Current Set: Morgan Hit List 40 VAM Set
  • BlackhawkBlackhawk Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭
    If you own it, it's AT... if a dealer has it, it's NT
    "Have a nice day!"
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140
    Welcome to the boards Louis - This thread may contain some answers for you.

    Frank
  • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    I think whether a coin is AT or NT is starting not to matter as much. The grading services seem like they are slowly lowering their standards of what they consider AT. If I see a toned coin I like I will buy it reagardless. mike
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    The ANA produces a video which is a great intro primer to first and second generation artificial toning.

    Go to here and type "How to Tell Artificial Toning" in the search box.
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Coins that exhibit spotted toning, regardless of color, are most likely artificially produced. >>

    Not always true, though. But if the coin does exhibit what appear to be "water spots" forming the toning, it's a better chance of being artificial. However, there can be spotted toning on coins naturally due to factors such as planchet preparation and storage. I have seen coins taken from original rolls (such as 64 kennedies) display spotting while others in the same roll had different toning patterns. And peace dollars are more prone to tone spots. Thing is, their toning spots look different from liquid or viscous gas induced toning.
  • Can someone use gasses to impose toning in orginal packaging from a mint set?
    Honesty is the Best Policy!
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Yes. All they have to do is make some pinholes into the cellophane and gas away. And there are several other ways they can do it. But from what I understand it's not done very often. Although there has been a big debate over some of the proof nickels coming out from 1960-64 proof sets with color.
  • True knowledge comes from (hands-on) experience.


    << <i>Thing is, their toning spots look different from liquid or viscous gas induced toning. >>


    Exactly, good point.
    J.Kriek
    Morgan Dollar Aficionado & Vammer
    Current Set: Morgan Hit List 40 VAM Set
  • I was asking for that same reason. A friend told me that about some pre-64 sets, as I have several Nickels in the proof sets that are toned.
    Honesty is the Best Policy!
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    From what I've seen, the purple ones tend to be natural. The circus colored ones seem all fake to me.
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    Almost a mirror image on both obverse and reverse. I don't collect these but the colors are funky looking and don't look like this on natural toned Franklins. The purple color floating over Ben's head. I will say that magenta color is close to what you see on Morgan's he just got it on the wrong coin. Hope this helps a little. Don't have more time to explain but hopefully someone else can jump in here on this one.
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Artificial Toning. How can you tell? >>



    Just post an image and the forum experts will take care of that for you. image

    Russ, NCNE
  • jbstevenjbsteven Posts: 6,178
    Blackhawk

    I own this coin. I do not believe it is NT. Your statement that if a dealer owns it then it is NT is false.

    image
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Blackhawk

    I own this coin. I do not believe it is NT. Your statement that if a dealer owns it then it is NT is false.

    image >>



    You a dealer?imageimage
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • jbstevenjbsteven Posts: 6,178


    << <i>You a dealer? >>



    maybe I should have said wanna be dealer? image
  • IwogIwog Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭
    Artificial toning is done on purpose, natural toning is done by accident.

    There is no way to tell the difference and other than the above statment there is no way to DEFINE the difference either.
    "...reality has a well-known liberal bias." -- Stephen Colbert
  • Ok, Here goes. I hope
    Honesty is the Best Policy!
  • Honesty is the Best Policy!
  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    louiskeller: IMHO, that is an ugly, streaked nickelimage
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • Yea, Unfortunately I was not able to filter out the scratch marks from the mint cellophane (or whatever it is). If the Nickel is examined at different angles it can be seen.

    Even though my Grandpa left me a several pre-1964 sets (not worth much that I know), I just did not want to take it out of the wrapper for better scans. Toning looks cool but I don't really know much about it.

    I'm a newbie who namely collects commemorative and just want to learn more about my hobby.

    Thanks! image
    Honesty is the Best Policy!
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    It has the subtle purple look I've seen in a number of those. I have enough confidence to say it's real.
  • nwcs, do you have an example of what you refer to as "water spots"? Thanks!
    image
  • Is this something I should keep? Or since I collect mainly silver and commemoratives, would it be better for me to trade/give it away to others while keeping the quarters and halfs, or should I just keep it in the mint set and wait?
    Honesty is the Best Policy!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file