Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Difference in '63 Post and Jello?

I have a '63 Mays that I am not sure if it is a Post or Jello issue? Is there a way to tell? It is autographed and I want to send it in to PSA/DNA for authentication and grading but I was not sure if they graded Jello? I know I have seen some graded Post cards listed on Ebay.

Comments

  • I answered my own question regarding grading Jello. There are some Jello and Post listed in the pop reports. My other question still holds - How do I tell if it is Post or Jello?
  • AknotAknot Posts: 1,196 ✭✭
    Well get two women together in Bikinis. If they start wrestling in it, its jello.

    image

    sorry...
    image
  • I'm afraid this is not going to help too much but I am sure that Beckett addressed this in the past year in the "Readers Write" section of Beckett Sports Collectibles (f/k/a Vintage). Unfortunately I do not save many back issues. The one thing I vaguely remember them saying had to do with the length of the line that runs above the stats section with one being longer on one issue than the other.


  • AknotAknot Posts: 1,196 ✭✭
    Here is the only thing I could find at this moment:

    The 1962 Jell-O promotion and card distribution was far less boistrous than its cereal munching and crunching counterpart. In fact, a complete set of 1962 Jell-O baseball cards - in any condition - is very rare. Although never confirmed by GF insiders, many advanced collectors believe that the set was a test promotion centered in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois regions of the U.S. Baseball hobbyists enjoy a good mystery, and the 1962 Jell-O cards read like a classic "whodunnit". While sharing the same photographs (with cropping alterations) and parallel text as the Post cards, the Jell-O set is absent Brooks Robinson (#29), Ted Kluszewski (#82), and Smoky Burgess (#176).
    image
Sign In or Register to comment.