Home U.S. Coin Forum

In case any early copper guys are interested.....

Comments

  • coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭
    If I'm not mistaken were these all not made on a screw press? If so, how do you come up with a double struck coin that's not on-purpose? I would think they would have to know they were screwing this one twice.

    Oh man, I just realized what I typed, didn't mean it when I typed it, but am leaving it for humor sake. I could use humor right now.
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image


  • << <i>they were screwing this one twice. >>



    LOL image
  • NoGvmntNoGvmnt Posts: 1,126

    << they were screwing this one twice. >>


    Maybe it wasn't satisfied the first time!image

    Jim
  • mrpaseomrpaseo Posts: 4,753 ✭✭✭
    Very interesting, and a Pleasent way of bringing up your point image
  • coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭
    Absolutely classic, MrPaseo...the best TIC remark I've seen here yet.
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536
    As I mentioned in another post in order to strike coins efficiently with the screw press the operators would have to get into a steady rhythm swinging the weighted arm back and forth. They didn't pay any attention to whether or not there was a planchet on the die, that was the responsibility of the coiner. If he didn't get a previously struck coin out of the die and a new planchet in place before the press cycled down again he had no way to stop it and you got a double strike. (Couldn't take too much time , or he would get his hand crushed in the press.)
  • RittenhouseRittenhouse Posts: 565 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If he didn't get a previously struck coin out of the die and a new planchet in place before the press cycled down again he had no way to stop it and you got a double strike. (Couldn't take too much time , or he would get his hand crushed in the press.) >>



    That is one explanation for early double-strucks. The other is a failure of the feeding mechanism. If I recall correctly (need to double-check Cooper), feeding mechanisms were developed by the early 1700s. The US Mint had them; they are mentioned in the records. NJ mints likely since Harper was involved & is mentioned in connection with feeding mechanisms. Perhaps the other colonial mints too. Rather easy to design.
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536
    Either way the men operating the swing arm would stil be working with a continuing rhythm and not checking to make sure there was a planchet correctly placed on the die before swinging the arm.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    1 of a kind - bwuahahahahaha!

    K S

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file