Home U.S. Coin Forum

Do you agree with the grade on this 1793 cent?

PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭

Comments

  • Dennis88Dennis88 Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭
    Depending on the Reverse, it looks like a lower grade...

    Dennis
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Not that I know much about early copper. It's pretty well preserved detail wise.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • The obverse looks like a strong Fine, the reverse a tad less than Good. I think VG is definitely a fair grade for this one especially considering most collectors lend more weight to the obverse grade.
  • ColorfulcoinsColorfulcoins Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭
    Obv does look nice fine butthe reverse is equal too or worse to the one I have that's in an AG03 holder!
    Craig
    If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
  • 410a410a Posts: 1,325
    VG 8 net grade G 6. Has large pitting on obv.
  • Early coinage cannot be graded the same as more modern coins because of the low technology used to strike them. Early coinage has to be graded as such. I generally agree with the seller's remarks, although VF details is a stretch. She really looks F12 on details, but, due to the slight porisity and vertical mark, VG10 was the net grade. The reverse, IMO, was weakly struck, and weak strikes were common in early coinage. I think VG10 is conservative, and probably correct.
    Author of MrKelso's official cheat thread words of wisdom on 5/30/04. image
    imageimage
    Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,988 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd say no. Strikes me as more of a Good+.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    oh a good day with me being generous and you buy me a really good lunch ......................................net good

    and if i was looking for a good condition wreath cent

    i would definately pass on this coin too many huge problems


    michael
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    overall negative eye appeal


    michael
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    here's an example of a market graded coin, due to the type and age.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,874 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The obverse has F-VF sharpness, but the coin is glandular. This piece was probably corroded and was quite ugly. Then someone worked on it, who knew what they were doing, and improved it to the state where it is now. If this were not a Wreath cent, it probably would have caught a body bag, but it was saved by its rarity and popularity. The reverse is only a G-6.The coin has been net graded / market graded to VG, which probably about right for it.

    The thing about the Wreath and Pole to Cap cents is that the lettering on the reverse was often very delicate. If you ever have a chance to see an EF or better example you will see that some letters were not sharp from the get-go, and there was no protective rim to shield them from wear. Therefore it's no unusual to see copper coins from this era, especially when they are well worn, that have decent obverses and mediocre to poor reverses.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    I would have said G-8, but I'm not paid $250,000 a year to grade coins.
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file