first time try at regrade..results

koinkrazy

This is my first try at regrades or upgrades, which ever way you prefer to say it. Anyway the results where good I think

1858 dollar proof 62 upgraded to proof 63

1856 half dollar proof 64 graded proof 64 cameo

1802/1 dollar xf-45 upgraded to au-50

1892-0 dollar ms-64 did not upgrade

jbsteven

3 out of 4 is not bad at all. bummer about the 92 o

what holders did they come out of?

DennisH

3 out of 4 is outstanding! Way to go!!!

ealandg

Very nice! Please tell us what holders they were in.

Tootawl

75% is very impressive! Did you crack them out before sending them?

koinkrazy

These where all pcgs coins, I have 4 crossovers that should be graded by today or tomarrow, they where

1868 dollar anacs ms-63 pl

1853 quarter no arrows anacs ms-62

1859 dollar ngc ms-63

1795 draped bust dollar ngc xf-45

I will be happy if these just crossover to pcgs, but I think the 1795 has a good shot at au

Placid

So were they sent in the pcgs holders or cracked out first?

Stuart

koinkrazy: If they were sent in PCGS holders, were they old generation holders like Gen-1 rattlers, or perhaps old green label holders?

koinkrazy

No these where all left in their holders and all where new blue. I have some in first generation and old greens, but I thought I would try these first. I don't know, I kinda like leaving the coins in the old holders, but with the results I have had here, I might try a few of the old one, but make a note on the submission slip, not to reholder them if they do not at least upgrade.

mgoodm3

I would say that you did very well. Especially if they were sent in holdered and not raw.

IrishMike

Were these:

1) Undergraded the first time?
2) Liners?
3) Or results of loosened standards?
4) Victims of inconsistent grading?
5) All of the above?

RotatedRainbows

So 75% the coins you submitted were miss graded by PCGS the first time around, I feel sorry for the poor sap that originally sent them in to PCGS and was a victim of poor grading habits. Wonder how much money he lost by trusting PCGS to grade the coins right the first time, or are they now typical overgraded/maxed out coins you routinely see in PCGS holders.

Placid

<< <i>I would say that you did very well. Especially if they were sent in holdered and not raw. >>



Why does it make a difference? Pcgs cracks them out before they go to the grading room.

I doubt they will only crack them out of the old holders if they are upgrades as they crack them out before grading.

cohodk

You've got a good eye. Way to go!!