How accurate are those pre-ANACS ANA Holders in grading?
Wolf359
Posts: 7,656 ✭✭✭
Were they overgraded? Undergraded? Or correctly graded?
(no mark by the eye in the photo)
(no mark by the eye in the photo)
0
Comments
Considering the current belief (by many) that standards have loosened, I'd say that (by your picture/scan) that yours is worthy of at least 1 point. But that is just MY opinion from your picture/scan.
Jim
42/92
That is why I said at least 1 point, the glare on the cheek in the picture/scan may be hiding something and the cheek is one if not the major focal point. And, as you state, the reverse could contain something that we have not seen.
Jim
Free Trial
IMO, generally speaking, currently, most "pre-ANACS ANA Holders" are over-graded. After 10+years searching and cracked out, all under-graded or correctly graded pre-ANACS ANA coins are in PCGS/NGC holders.
<< <i>IMO, generally speaking, currently, most "pre-ANACS ANA Holders" are over-graded. After 10+years searching and cracked out, all under-graded or correctly graded pre-ANACS ANA coins are in PCGS/NGC holders. >>
Probably true. I actually see very few of these early ANACS holders. When I do see them they often contain low value coins that would not be worth reslabbing. Nearly 14 years have passed since they were last issued. That is a lot of time in the world of crack-outs.