Home PSA Set Registry Forum

April cc special

image

not really sure that a '53 Bowman Snider or Rizzuto would fly as a common, but a nice little special for the vintage guys.

Comments

  • they need to have a special for hockey.
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    I believe this IS for all sports.
    I have some cards in the hockey and FB boxes that will be going in.

  • Murcer- For some reason, your pic shows the March special.

    $7 for the commons only saves $1 per card, but the kicker is that there is no minimum submission size. I have a couple of odds and ends that I think I will send in.
  • Awesome. Might be time for me to send in the 50 Bowmans!
  • grilloj39grilloj39 Posts: 370 ✭✭
    it's nice paying a set price for any type of cards...don't have to wait or ask for specials.
    Gold Coins
    Silver Coins

    e-bay ID: grilloj39
    e-mail: grilloj39@gmail.com
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    it's nice paying a set price for any type of cards...don't have to wait or ask for specials

    In that case, you might want to try a grading company named Global Authentications Inc., commonly known as GAI (not for being GAI.... but G.A.I.).
    They probably have a web-site and even a chat forum. I don't think they have specials, but they might have a fixed discount for former military personnel.
  • pcpc Posts: 743


    << <i>it's nice paying a set price for any type of cards...don't have to wait or ask for specials. >>



    some are never satisfied.
    Money is your ticket to freedom.
  • DirtyHarryDirtyHarry Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭
    I believe murcerfan has the correct special listed. Just my opinion, but I think this is a weak promotion. It is not helping out the average collector any---it is helping PSA drum up some more business by grading 50 year old commons. It is obviously their duty and responsibility to create new avenues to generate income and increase shareholder wealth. But I think the monthly specials should be more focused on giving their paid membership a better benefit.
    Proud of my 16x20 autographed and framed collection - all signed in person. Not big on modern - I'm stuck in the past!
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    It is not helping out the average collector any

    I guess I must be below average.

    But I think the monthly specials should be more focused on giving their paid membership a better benefit.

    yeah, why the heck can't they grade our cards for free this month ?
  • DirtyHarryDirtyHarry Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭
    Murcerfan - you are probably "above average". That's my point.
    Proud of my 16x20 autographed and framed collection - all signed in person. Not big on modern - I'm stuck in the past!
  • grilloj39grilloj39 Posts: 370 ✭✭
    Yes, Murcerfan...I see your analogy...PSA grades more accurately/consistently and charges higher prices because they have a chat forum...how silly of me to overlook that. 7.00 a card is not a special imo...i think you guys deserve better.

    Edited to add: The graders at PSA are so superior to GAIs graders...PSA holders are so superior to GAIs holders, yes, murcerfan wants you all to bow down and thank PSA for charging you more....LOL.

    Remember the movie..."Thank you sir, can I have another...."Thank you sir, can I have another."
    Gold Coins
    Silver Coins

    e-bay ID: grilloj39
    e-mail: grilloj39@gmail.com
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    I see your analogy

    did I miss something ?
  • MantlefanMantlefan Posts: 1,079 ✭✭
    Edited to add: The graders at PSA are so superior to GAIs graders...PSA holders are so superior to GAIs holders, yes, murcerfan wants you all to bow down and thank PSA for charging you more....LOL

    You forgot one thing: PSA selling prices for the same card are consistently higher than SCG. So if I'm looking to grade my cards with an eye toward maximizing their value and eventually selling them in the future, the PSA choice is the right one.

    SCG could charge $1 a card and they would still be a second rate company. Actually, with Forman/Moser taking over, they could be third rate pretty soon.image
    Frank

    Always looking for 1957 Topps BB in PSA 9!
  • DirtyHarryDirtyHarry Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭
    Murcerfan -what's your beef? I posted my opinion. I do not think grading cards for free would be a good business decision. I just wonder what percentage of PSA's paid membership is sitting on ungraded 50 year old commons. I believe it would be somewhat low.
    Proud of my 16x20 autographed and framed collection - all signed in person. Not big on modern - I'm stuck in the past!
  • grilloj39grilloj39 Posts: 370 ✭✭
    Sorry I thought 7.00 was too much and loyal PSA customers deserve better pricing, but I guess you think it's OK...well if you submit to them, who am I to argue the price your're willing to pay. I'll leave it at that.
    Gold Coins
    Silver Coins

    e-bay ID: grilloj39
    e-mail: grilloj39@gmail.com
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    I just wonder what percentage of PSA's paid membership is sitting on ungraded 50 year old commons. I believe it would be somewhat low.

    Well that is very good news for clearing out the back-log and getting back to the quick turnaround times.
  • SportsCard Guaranty Corporation = SGC.

    The anti-PSA slant on the SGC board and the anti-SGC slant on this board both seem silly to me. This is a hobby we are supposed to enjoy with fellow collectors - even with those who may use a different card grading company. Helping out and being helped by other collectors is part what makes the hobby rewarding - even if the help is for/from someone who uses a different card grading company. It is fine to have an opinion about which company one believes puts out the best product, but why the need to put down other grading companies? Lets focus on enjoying the cards regardless of what slab they are in. Buy the card, not the holder.
    Kosmo
  • wolfbearwolfbear Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭



    << <i>I just wonder what percentage of PSA's paid membership is sitting on ungraded 50 year old commons >>



    I recommend that no one sit on 50 year old commons.

    Use a pillow, or a cushion, instead.
    You'll be more comfortable, and your cards will grade out higher ...



    Pix of 'My Kids'

    "How about a little fire Scarecrow ?"
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    Well, if they will grade my R 312s (Pastel Premiums) at $ 7 apiece, I'll be submitting under the special.

    R314s (Goudey Wide Pens) would be nice at that price too.

    As far as how many PSA members are sitting on commons from 1953 and before, this is the one area that I don't recall as having been covered by any special (other than things like the Super Bowl card Show 2 cards for $10 special).

    I think it's a good thing to sometimes have specials covering obscure areas that are generally left out of other specials.

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    obscure areas

    ie, all sportscards produced before 1954 ?

    edited to add: I agree with you that rotating special pricing has allowed me to send smaller submissions on a more frequent basis. The only one I can;t recall taking advantage of was that silly modern card deal for $5/each...seems like PSA is just now recovering from that one.


  • << <i>Edited to add: The graders at PSA are so superior to GAIs graders...PSA holders are so superior to GAIs holders, yes, murcerfan wants you all to bow down and thank PSA for charging you more....LOL

    You forgot one thing: PSA selling prices for the same card are consistently higher than SCG. So if I'm looking to grade my cards with an eye toward maximizing their value and eventually selling them in the future, the PSA choice is the right one.

    SCG could charge $1 a card and they would still be a second rate company. Actually, with Forman/Moser taking over, they could be third rate pretty soon.image >>



    Mantlefan, you are right, then again you are wrong. Let's say you have a mantle card like your icon graded a PSA 6. Let's say it goes for $30,000. If that same card goes to GAI, it could be an 8 because they tend to be a little more liberal with their grading. Don't you think it will sell for more than $30 G's? that's how a GAI or a SGC card can sell for more, although I think SGC may be getting stricter. or better yet. a TRIMMED Mantle 52 would not be holdered, yet that same card could be a PRO 10! That would sell.


    A true March special would be any Pre 1954 cards, stars, or commons for $5.00! I would go out and buy cards just to get them graded for that cheap. image lol
  • VarghaVargha Posts: 2,392 ✭✭
    I haven't seen where GAI is any easier (or tougher) than PSA on their grading. The two seem pretty similar in how they grade cards. That only makes sense since Baker and Rocchi were the lead graders at PSA.
  • 19541954 Posts: 2,898 ✭✭✭
    Dirty Harry-
    When PSA announced that the special for the month was $5 for 1973 to present. I don't recall anyone saying "that is the worst special PSA has ever done." PSA is here to TRY to please everyone. By doing that they have specials for non sports cards, old cards, new cards and shinny cards. What you collect is your business and enjoy your hobby. Your opinion on this issue is offensive to many including me. You are stepping on some toes here and probably need to take a back seat awhile until you understand the word respect.

    1954
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases
  • CON40CON40 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭
    The anti-PSA slant on the SGC board and the anti-SGC slant on this board both seem silly to me.

    kosmo, it's called brand loyalty! My dad always drove Fords when I was a kid. As a result, in our house, GMs and Chryslers were cr@p... however, across the street...
  • wolfbearwolfbear Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭

    CON40 - good point, but I think a better analogy would be :
    The United States Armed Forces vs France's military.

    Just one unbiased observerer's opinion ... image

    Pix of 'My Kids'

    "How about a little fire Scarecrow ?"
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    Wolfie.
    that's a pretty strong indictment.
    Just because PSA is avoiding WIWAG and some other issues does not qualify them as "French"...yet.
  • DirtyHarryDirtyHarry Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭
    Holy cow. I've have gotten myself in the middle of one of these threads that I have read before that result in personal attacks.
    I simply lodged a marketing opinion on a PSA promotion. Not attacking anyone's collecting preference or meaning any disrespect to anyone. For those that can take advantage of this- great, looks like it is good for quite a few.

    1954veteran - the conclusion of your post is uncalled for. When I see the thread come out that states you have been elected as "Chairman of the Boards" -- you will then be entitled to ask me to take a back seat on something.
    Proud of my 16x20 autographed and framed collection - all signed in person. Not big on modern - I'm stuck in the past!
  • 19541954 Posts: 2,898 ✭✭✭
    Dirty Harry-"member"- sorry if I offended you. Continue stating remarks about PSA's generosity for other collectors.

    1954
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases


  • << <i>Dirty Harry-"member"- sorry if I offended you. Continue stating remarks about PSA's generosity for other collectors.

    1954 >>



    Calm down guys, we're giving each other attacks over pieces of carboard being put in plastic. Do you think that is the topic at the dinner table of a family who just lost their son in Iraq, or a family whose father just died. PSA SCHMEESA, when we're dead all this stuff will be worthless to us because we can't take it with us, so lighten up guys. As for the GAI comment, I have only had one experience with a GAI card, so I can't say that I am anywhere near an expert, BUT, I bought a GAI 8 Sawchuk 1954 Topps, that I over paid and crossed it over to PSA. They graded it a 6. OuCH! We all know that PRO is garbage, as for KSA, I have yet to see a KSA card crossover to the same grade or better at PSA, only worse. Beckett has been pretty good. SGC has actually been stricter than PSA in the one order I sent them. Every single card graded lower. I hope this helps everyone.
  • kobykoby Posts: 1,699 ✭✭


    << <i>As for the GAI comment, I have only had one experience with a GAI card, so I can't say that I am anywhere near an expert, BUT, I bought a GAI 8 Sawchuk 1954 Topps, that I over paid and crossed it over to PSA. They graded it a 6. OuCH! >>



    This happens alot. You have to be careful when you purchase GAI cards. Some say that you should automatically subtract one full grade when you are thinking about a GAI card and then you can price the card accordingly.


  • << <i>

    << <i>As for the GAI comment, I have only had one experience with a GAI card, so I can't say that I am anywhere near an expert, BUT, I bought a GAI 8 Sawchuk 1954 Topps, that I over paid and crossed it over to PSA. They graded it a 6. OuCH! >>



    This happens alot. You have to be careful when you purchase GAI cards. Some say that you should automatically subtract one full grade when you are thinking about a GAI card and then you can price the card accordingly. >>



    i wish i talked to you before i bought the card koby. it was a waste of money.
Sign In or Register to comment.