Original? edited. Different one up for questioning...

coinlieutenant · March 18, 2004 7:39AM

Half 2

JrGMan2004 · March 18, 2004 7:44AM

My answer is... Not a Dang Clue...

coinlieutenant · March 18, 2004 7:45AM

That is a very honest answer George!!

291fifth · March 18, 2004 7:46AM

My guess is that is was dipped some time ago and is retoning.

darktone · March 18, 2004 7:49AM

XF-AU surface corrosion- the surfaces look odd?

Varlis · March 18, 2004 7:53AM

I'd say it's not original--the fields look washed out, and the toning is just sort of sitting there. Unless there's something else going on we can't tell from the picture.

coinlieutenant · March 18, 2004 7:54AM

what about this one?

ColonialCoinUnion · March 18, 2004 7:54AM

The first one is absolutely not original. Maybe it was dipped or cleaned a long time ago, but it still looks odd.

The second one is less offensive, but to me its also a no-go.

JrGMan2004 · March 18, 2004 7:55AM

I'm gonna go with... Not a Dang Clue on this one, too... but at first glance to my untrained eye, that really doesn't find Seated Libs attractive but am still giving it a try... it looks nice...