How About a "Second Opinion" by Graders?
scottsusor
Posts: 1,210
The thread about "Grader's Notes" got me thinking (yeh, I know that's usually a bad thing). Has anybody ever asked Joe, or any of the graders at a show, about "second opinions?" What I mean is -- Does a card ever get a "second opinion" before being slabbed? Or is every card submitted graded only by a single grader, then slabbed?
Obviously it would not be cost effective to have every card subject to this -- only cards where Grader #1 is "in doubt" as to whether his/her initial determination is "in between" say a 7 and an 8 (the good old 7.5 argument again, or 8.5 between an 8 and a 9). It just seems to me that with no half-grades, that this type of thing would make sense. Oops, there I go making sense again, sorry.
Comments?
Scott
Obviously it would not be cost effective to have every card subject to this -- only cards where Grader #1 is "in doubt" as to whether his/her initial determination is "in between" say a 7 and an 8 (the good old 7.5 argument again, or 8.5 between an 8 and a 9). It just seems to me that with no half-grades, that this type of thing would make sense. Oops, there I go making sense again, sorry.
Comments?
Scott
0
Comments
I can't confirm this myself, but I was told that PSA grades in teams of three... first two graders look at a card and assign a grade. If their grades match, that is the grade the card will receive. If their grades are different, then the third grader becomes the "tie breaker", and that grade is assigned. I always thought this made sense, if it is indeed true.
Can anyone else out there confirm this method of grading?
Keith
However - as a former fraud investigator and internal controls consultant - I can tell you from a cost perspective the adverse outcomes that result in the above from a disagreement with the first grader....
<< <i>For modern cards, I was told explicitly by a high-level PSA official that cards were graded by one grader, encapsulated, and, only after encapsulation, did the card go through a review process. Supposedly, if there was a disagreement, the card was removed each and every time. >>
hummmmmm.................a review process while slabbed. So, how much can really be reviewed in slab form? It must only be for the most obvious of mistakes or slips.
hummmmmm.................
BOTR
I'm not sure about this... aren't the cards slabbed in a separate process by a different group (within the building)? If this is true, why aren't trimmed or size requirement cards sent back in slabs? Wouldn't they be slabbed at PSA prior to a review just like "normal" cards?