Could someone grade this dime?

rikker

Can this dime be graded from these scans or are they not clear enough?

Prometheus183

I'm not worth beans yet at grading, but I'd guess XF45. I'm probably way off, as the real experts here will proove.
The reverse looks nearly FB, but that weak strike and wear of the lower diag. band is a bit detracting.
Nevertheless, looks original. I'd like to see a "D" popping out of that reverse.

Craig

ms70

I would say AU55.

joecool

I say XF45.....

Baley

I like it as a 53

skate4357

Cleaned retoned ANACS Net AU50 PCGS Body Bag

marcmoish

EF-45 at best - nice strike - FB - but too uch wear for AU !!




Marc

mnmcoin

EF-45

morris <><

Donovan

XF-45 cleaned.

dorkkarl

au-50.

K S

291fifth

AU by current standards. Possibly cleaned at one time.

Fairlaneman

Where are these xf grades coming from on this coin? The weakness shown in the hair is strike and not wear. Same for the lower diagonal on the reverse.

I will say AU55 or 58 because the luster cannot be seen from the photo. This coin could be mint state very easily.

Ken

nwcs

AU. Now please send me $100 for the same day grading results.

remumc

AU53-55. I agree with Ken in that much of what you are seeing is strike weakness not wear, but I do see noticable wear to the hair.

Regards,

Wayne

nankraut

PCGS: body bag-cleaned; ANACS: AU details-cleaned, net XF

ANACONDA

XF40-45

The revese looks nicer than the obverse. It looks original to me.

ANACONDA

The wear is in the fields on the obverse - see the disruption in the toning. Just my opinion. Strangely enough, the reverse could be called mint state by some, just judging by the image - not really any wear obvious on the reverse and the marks don't seem to have edges that have wear on them....the edges look too sharp and not worn down.

TROUT70

au55 ??

Baley

depends on the luster.

BigGreek

Lot's of folks calling it cleaned.. what is tipping you off that it's been cleaned?

mercurynut

This is an AU coin to me

UncleJoe

It may just be the scan. It has that "washed" look.

From a wear point of view this can easily be AU but the scan is not picking up any luster if there is any.

Joe.