Grades From Across the Street
Rampage
Posts: 9,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
Line....Date-MM.....Denom/Grade
001--1882-S........S$1..MS 63Happy. Nice target toning, Redield Hoard
002--1882-S........S$1..MS 63Happy. Nice target toning, Redield Hoard
003--1953-S........25C..MS 66Very happy. Super toning.
004--1954-P........25C..MS 65Satisifed. Super toning.
005--1953-D........10C..MS 64Hoped for higher, but not disappointed because the toning is awesome.
001--1882-S........S$1..MS 63Happy. Nice target toning, Redield Hoard
002--1882-S........S$1..MS 63Happy. Nice target toning, Redield Hoard
003--1953-S........25C..MS 66Very happy. Super toning.
004--1954-P........25C..MS 65Satisifed. Super toning.
005--1953-D........10C..MS 64Hoped for higher, but not disappointed because the toning is awesome.
0
Comments
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
<< <i>What did the Redfield holder say? 65?
DCAM.....Yes, it was one of the MS65 holders, but believe me, it was in no way, shape or form, an MS65. I expected to get MS63 on both. I just wanted them in an NGC holder in case I decided to sell them in the near future since the toning is often felt AT.
"002--1882-S........S$1..MS 63Happy. Nice target toning, Redield Hoard "
Fix that keyboard.
Jim
It has been my experience the Redfields are worth dramatically more in the original holders. I would be curious how anyone could argue AT in a Redfield...I have never heard that before.
Doug
<< <i>I would be curious how anyone could argue AT in a Redfield >>
A really old guy told me once he saw a Redfield holder that had been tampered with and was ATed.
I would call it VERY rare to run across one.
<< <i>DCAM.....Yes, it was one of the MS65 holders, but believe me, it was in no way, shape or form, an MS65 >>
Rampage- I've seen well over 100 of them in "65" and I have yet to see one that would actually grade MS-65. I do NOT understand the premium that attaches to the coins! I've never paid a premium for an overgrader's coins!
<< <i>
<< <i>DCAM.....Yes, it was one of the MS65 holders, but believe me, it was in no way, shape or form, an MS65 >>
Rampage- I've seen well over 100 of them in "65" and I have yet to see one that would actually grade MS-65. I do NOT understand the premium that attaches to the coins! I've never paid a premium for an overgrader's coins!
DCAM- I did not pay MS65 money for either of the two coins. Both were bought for a little less than MS62 money. Each has very nice target toning on the obverse and reverse, much like the auction link I posted some time ago that uofa was selling on eBay that brought over $500.00. The eBay coin was just a different date.
<< <i>Congrats on the grades.
It has been my experience the Redfields are worth dramatically more in the original holders. I would be curious how anyone could argue AT in a Redfield...I have never heard that before.
Doug >>
Doug- The few people I showed them to thought they were ATed for sure. Of course, I did not think so, that is why I bought them. At least this way, they are correctly graded.
Thanks to everyone who replied.
Richard.