Another Morgan question for you guys. New pics added JB

JRocco

Once again I have to plead ignorance with Morgan's as I am just starting with this series. Why did this only grade ANACS MS61 DMPL? What am I missing here as I would see a 63(on a good day of course)

jbsteven

the angles you have the photo at does not show the marks. impossible to tell from photo

Wolf359

ANACS grades by luster. Line it up next to 58, 62, & 63 ANACS morgans and the difference may pop right out.

JRocco

Here are a few more shots.

TRIPSTER2000

The reverse looks good but from the pics the obverse looks like the hair is worn just a bit above the ear and looks like a mark on the cheek? Also a mark on the S.

jbsteven

It seems like there is a bit of chatter infront of the face and the marks on the cheek.

paigowjohnny

a lot of "cloudiness" in the fields

anablep

I thought CC Morgans were given a little leeway in grading (like a point). This coin should at least be a 62 maybe 63. The strike is decent.
A 61 would be slightly less baggy than a 60.
Maybe the scan is deceptive...
Now I see its a DMPL. Any little bag mark is amplified by those mirrored fields.

JRocco

Thanks guys, I have a lot to learn with Morgan's.