Home U.S. Coin Forum

Opinions on this Peace Dollar

I'm new at buying Peace Dollars. Give any and all comments including things to look for and an idea of grade....Thanks, Ken
.
.image
.
.image

Comments

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I'm not going to get caught calling another one 58. I'll say 63
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭✭
    Needs a good polishing image



    Honestly though.......the obverse strike looks a little weak and there looks like some splotches from an old dipping maybe.........I don't know a thing about these so I won't even ventrue a guess as to grade.
    imageimage

  • XpipedreamRXpipedreamR Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
    I'd say 63, maybe 64. I don't think the obverse strike looks that weak.

    I don't know about the luster/"dusty" toning. Maybe needs a good polishing like GaCoinGuy suggestedimage
  • As soon as I get done digesting my dinner and finish my beer, I'll polish it up a bit......imageimageimage
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a nice original roll MS64 coin. Some milk spotting on both sides but nice frost on frost with only minor breaks and small scuffs.
    Nice coin. You can still find nice Peace dollars cheap. Last year I bought an orig roll for $185 and they had nice toning and surfaces.
    Most were MS63 to MS64. But none were MS65's.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    I would avoid ones with white spots on them and the big hits on the face & forehead and on the eagle's back makes me think it's ms63. Maybe 64 on a good day but that is a common year and readily available in nice condition so no need to be overly generous with the grade.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    i,d grade the scan only a couple points below gem grade so 63 is my guess
  • MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
    AU58!!!!image
    It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

  • PutTogetherPutTogether Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭
    The strike actually isn't bad (for a peace dollar) I'm going to call it a 58 because the black on the eagle looks like wear. If I'm wrong about that, then I'd say 63
  • oo..oooo.. a Peace $ thread.... Here's my .02...

    I'll assume some of you have the "basic" knowledge of this series so I'll try to skip the common stuff..... Here's some mint figures....

    Philadelphia mint produce coins for every year.
    Denver mint produced coins for 22,23,26,27,34 only
    SF produced coins from 22 on for each year.

    The first thing you have to realize is that each of the mints produced a different quality coin. San Fran produced the worse.. strikes were mushy in the center with little detail. Denver mint coins were very crisp with high detail. The 22-23' have strike quality issues..... and everyone knows about the 21' and the issues with the high relief....

    When looking for wear, here's what I do.....

    1) I look for any discoloration/haze/blemish/hue on the cheek or face. This will indicate a AU-58 coin or less.
    2) I'll flip the coin to check the top right shoulder of the eagle. Study one in a 65/66 holder to see what an unworn should should look like. Once you know what to look for, then you can compare. If there is no wear... it's a least a MS-60....
    3) I then flip again and look at hair quality (this takes more time to study and get right) and look for wear.. not stike quality... people confuse strike quality to wear... I look at the bun above the eye and ear area mostly.
    4) Then I usually look at the toenails of the eagle for separation of the nail.... this tells me a couple things... one is strike quality... if it isn't defined, the strike is usually good but not outstanding or "complete". Hits to this area or slide marks over the nails which completely remove this detail will point to a MS60 at best....

    Then you have all sorts of other things to consider:

    1) Original luser...
    2) Retone from a dip...
    3) Eye appeal in general...
    4) Sharpness of hits...
    5) Location and # of hits...

    The coin you have pictured (going from the pic) looks AU-58 to me.......
  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    MS-60
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    I have to go with Peaceman on this, all the high points on the reverse appear to have the slightest amout of friction. AU58. Still, a nice looking coin and a have a 23-P that is just like it that I keep out to show relatives.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    By the way Ken, this coin and the Morgan you did this morning are excellent images which make it easy to guess-the-grade. Very tough with small or blurry images.
  • AU58
  • dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    Looks like it's been dipped at least once or twice. It's an average BU roll quality unc. worth in the $10.00 - $14.00 area. As far as grade, about a 63 at best.

    dragon
  • Peaceman, thanks for the valuable info. I'm going to copy it and keep for reference.
    .

    K6AZ, thanks for the compliments on my photography. I could not take pics like this a year ago. But, thanks to lots of help on this forum and loads of practice, I believe I'm getting the hang of it.....
    ....Ken

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file