A not-so-hypothetical question
jimrupprecht
Posts: 75
Ok, here's the question....
If the opportunity presented itself, would you sell a significant portion of your collection in order to acquire a single, significant item (card, memoriabilia, etc.)? That is, would you rather have one significant item in your collection, or many smaller items (ie. do you want a T-206 Honus or the rest of the set, assuming equal value to both)?
And the event driving this question... I have been given such an opportunity. Essentially, I would need to sell 60-65 percent of my existing collection value-wise in order to purchase the item. The cost of the item precludes simply borrowing the $.
Thoughts?
-
JR
If the opportunity presented itself, would you sell a significant portion of your collection in order to acquire a single, significant item (card, memoriabilia, etc.)? That is, would you rather have one significant item in your collection, or many smaller items (ie. do you want a T-206 Honus or the rest of the set, assuming equal value to both)?
And the event driving this question... I have been given such an opportunity. Essentially, I would need to sell 60-65 percent of my existing collection value-wise in order to purchase the item. The cost of the item precludes simply borrowing the $.
Thoughts?
-
JR
0
Comments
For example -- I wouldn't be surprised if there were people out there who were selling off certain cards/sets in order to pursue some of the rare, unopened stuff offered by Mastro.
MS
I am currently looking at downsizing my current collection from a shoebox down to half a shoebox, to get more capital for some rumored cards coming up.
When the deal is done please tell us what is was for!
Collectable
downsize that Rizzuto S-M to me
Sorry, but there is still room in the half shoebox for that one. It will take my wife to make me get rid of that one instead of Mr. Jablonski.
And if she finds another house, you will be the first person I call!
Collectable
2005 Origins Old Judge Brown #/20 and Black 1/1s, 2000 Ultimate Victory Gold #/25
2004 UD Legends Bake McBride autos & parallels, and 1974 Topps #601 PSA 9
Rare Grady Sizemore parallels, printing plates, autographs
Nothing on ebay
If the choice were the T206Wagner in PSA 1 poor condition or the T206 set w/o the Wagner (all slabbed PSA 4 and assuming same value) I would go for the set minus the Wagner.
If the choice were between the PSA 10 Sportsking Cobb and the 1952 Topps set all PSA 8 sold a year ago, I would go for the 1952 set.
If the choice were between a PSA 10 1986 Jordan and two PSA 9 1986 fleer sets, I think I would go for the two sets.
I would definately sell and go for the quality,especially if the item being offered is not one that comes around very often.Most cards are available at least a few times a year.Also,if your item is worth that much now,What might it be worth down the road?
Just my .02 worth!!
And if you do the deed,by all means let us in on the moment.We all like an "ooo and ahh" every now and them.
Vic
I think on something like this you almost have to approach it from an investment standpoint. If it's something that you think will appreciate considerably over time, then it's probably a no-brainer. If not, or if you think those items you'd have to sell will appreciate faster than the blue-chip item in question, then I'd really have to think about it if I were you.
Obviously, if you really want it then that trumps all other concerns. This is, after all, a hobby. But when the decision is close-- and it sounds like it is, otherwise you probably wouldn't have solicited opinions-- then I tend to go with the option that I think will be the most profitable. If nothing else this keeps you from second guessing yourself years down the road, as at least you can always tell yourself you made the most informed decision at the time, given the knowledge you then had at your disposal.
To this end, I'd say do it for sure IF the item in question is either a) pre-war, or b) something which could not conceivably carry its current premium because of the peculiararities of today's collecting climate. So, for instance, I'd sell it all for something like a T205 Christy Mathewson in PSA 8 (the most beautiful card ever, IMO, or at least tied for 1st with the '53 Bowman Color Reese and the '58 Parkhurst Jacques Plante). But I wouldn't do it for for a '67 Mantle PSA 10. Why? Because there's no guarantee that we've found all the Mantles, and there's certainly no guarantee that the PSA 10 label will carry the same clout in 20 years that it does now. A PSA 8 will always 'basically' be considered a mint card; but it's possible that, years from now, a PSA 9 or 10 will be seen as being essentially the same as an 8, which will drive the price down. Of course it could go the other way too, but why gamble? We've seen shifts in the general paradigm before when it comes to the nuances of grading (remember when anything centered 80/20, with 4 reasonable corners, was considered 'mint'?), so there's no reason to think this won't happen again.
Anyway, best of luck whatever you do. And don't keep us in the dark!! Tell us what you're looking to pull the trigger on!!!
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.