Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Unusual Flips?! are they right?

I know that the Font has changed on the flips
over the years, but I don't recall ever seeing this one
and also
the info on the right side is not lined up... I have
never see a flip that did not have the info lined up!

Just curious to me....

imageimage

image
imageimage

Comments

  • also...
    these two cards are listed as different years
    and yet they are the same card?...?....?

    imageimage
    imageimage
  • DavemriDavemri Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭
    That looks strange to me as well. Have you tried running the cert #'s??

    dave

    FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
    image
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    PSA briefly used flips that looked like that. All good.
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.


  • << <i>PSA briefly used flips that looked like that. All good. >>

    cool
    it just looked weird.

    the cert #s are good.


    any idea about the two cards that are
    listed as a 1999 and a 2000 when they are the same??

    imageimage
    imageimage
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    Yes they are the same card from the same product...99 UD Encore they pulled 1:288
    packs. The subset name was UD Authentics, the second is labeled correctly as it is
    from UD Encore and NOT UD Authentics.....which today is an actual product! LOL There
    was no UD Authentics in 2000, however the card might say 2000 on the bottom.

    Bottom line is the grader or the owner didn't know what they were doing when they labeled/sent
    it in.

    Hope this helps
    JS
  • qualitycardsqualitycards Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭
    The flips look OK, but the sigs look a bit different...jay
  • PSA did that to me on a Mark Prior "Recollection Collection" which was a 2001 rookie card.

    One they properly labeled 2001 and the other 2002; made it tough to get the bid I was looking for with the 2002 date.

  • JmnesqJmnesq Posts: 250 ✭✭


    << <i>PSA did that to me on a Mark Prior "Recollection Collection" which was a 2001 rookie card.

    One they properly labeled 2001 and the other 2002; made it tough to get the bid I was looking for with the 2002 date. >>



    Actually, they graded the 2002 correct.

    The PRior Recollection Auto NEVER EXISTED in 2001. While the card desgn is 2001 Elite, the serial #ing (/25, I believe), is added in 2002, as the only serial #ing on the 2001 cards was to /1000. THese were new cards, produced in 2001 but not released to the market place until 2002. THey're 2002 cards.

    The 2001 card was graded incorrectly and will probably bring more $ into your auction, despite the fact that it shouldn't.
    Jeff

    Collecting Bowman Chrome Phillies Rookie Cards and Mike Schmidt certified auto cards.
  • Seems I heard that before Jeff..hmmm...

    Anyways, the 2001 was #ed to only 10 and fetched $2700 in the hysteria leading to Bartman's fateful decision; luckily, the card sold 2 days before the Cubs were eliminated.

    See ya at the other place, Jeff ! image
Sign In or Register to comment.