Home U.S. Coin Forum

How do you tell the difference between rub and wear??

I enjoyed Mark's post about telling the difference between a weak strike and wear, but how do you tell if it is rub. I look at MS coins with what looks like light wear and people say that it is rub and not wear?? What is the difference??

Jay
image

Comments

  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Jay, my somewhat simplistic (but hopefully not unsatisfactory) answer is:

    "Rub/cabinet friction/stacking friction" as it's called, is theoretically not the result of circulation. "Wear', on the other hand, is. When a coin has been circulated, in addition to the "wear" which appears on it, there will typically be other tell-tale signs, such as circulation/handling marks, dirt, impaired luster and surfaces etc.

    That said, in many cases, on a technical and practical basis, it is nearly impossible to distinguish "rub" from "wear". And, some would even argue that they are one and the same. They might even be right. image
  • Mark,

    My opinion is that they are one in the same. Whether wear is caused from circulation or from rubbing in a cabinet, is it still not the same?? Either way it is noticable and will make a change in color or luster on the coin. When I look at bust halves for instance, I will see some graded AU58 and others MS61-63 that look the same.

    With that said, how high can a coin grade if it is considdered to be rub??

    Jay
    image
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Same difference as between a touch and a feel.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • rottnrogrottnrog Posts: 683 ✭✭✭
    I also consider them the same!!
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,066 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wear IMHO leaves greater evidence of circulation...perhaps even some light and small hairlines. The coin will not have full lustre and the highest points of interest will be compromised. Rub, in my view, is almost like cabinet friction and perhaps cabinet friction is a better term to use. Rub will also effect the highest points as well as the quality of the lustre.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,631 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Same difference as between a touch and a feel. >>



    ...and this is how a wise old bear becomes known as a wise old bear.

    There may be no wrong answer (at least in this thread), but there is a slightly
    different quality to the type of wear that a collector is likely to impart. It will
    typically be a very fine "polishing" sort of wear on the older coins which were
    often stored in cabinets or handled over many years. Newer coins with rub
    might have collided with the adjacent coin in a roll over many decades.

    Circulation wear does tend to be more dynamic than the wear collectors usually
    cause to coins. Circulation wear often knocks off significant amounts of metal
    from sloughing, cutting, or shearing as the coins are forced against other coins,
    counters, or sharp objects in pockets or elsewhere. Wear is unique to all coins
    which exhibit it though at some point as it approaches a basil state it becomes
    quite impossible to tell usually.
    Tempus fugit.
  • IMO, there is a difference.
    Rub occurs when a coin slides across a surface, hence the term "slider".
    Only the highest surfaces and edges should be affected.

    Wear comes from the coin's subjection to handling. Fingers tend to contact
    allsurfaces of a coin so damage is more uniform. All luster is lost.
  • WondoWondo Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭
    You buying or selling? image
    Wondo

  • You buying or selling?

    image


    You are correct on this one!!!
    image
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭
    By the time has perceptable rub of any type odds are 99% that the coin's fields and other areas show obvious signs of abuse. Hence, the coin is in the AU58-MS62 range of which there is little to no difference. This is just a marketing ploy by the grading services.
    AU58-62 seems to apply well to moderns but for 19th and 18th century coins, those grades are essentially identical. Luster is significantly IMPAIRED or broken up with chatter.

    RUB = WEAR

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • ccexccex Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭
    Is AU-58 actually MS-63 with rub? If so, according to which grading services?
    "Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity" - Hanlon's Razor
  • I have a Seated Dollar which I have had graded between MS61 and AU58 by Heritage, NGC, and PCGS.
    David Hall gave me a good explaination of why one grader views it as rubbing and another as wear.
    (PCGS was the conservative AU58 grade)
    Robert Getty - Lifetime project to complete the finest collection of 1872 dated coins.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>With that said, how high can a coin grade if it is considered to be rub?? >>

    Jay, I have seen numerous older type coins in MS66 holders, some in MS67 holders and perhaps even a few in MS68 holders, that I would technically describe as having "rub".

    As one type that quickly comes to mind - Capped Bust half dollars, no matter how high the grade, almost always appear to have some "rub" on Ms. Liberty's cheek.

  • If you're a dealer and you are selling it's rub, if you are buying it's wear.

    If you are a collector then it is the other way around.
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it's on my coin, it's rub.

    If it's on your coin, it's wear. image

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    "Ah, there's the rub"...... whoops, I meant "ah, where's the rub"? No, that's not it either, it's "ah, wear's the rub"?image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file