Education Thread II. With all the 1916-D coins brought up lately-check the MM on this one.
fcloud
Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
Here is a link to a raw 1916-D. The seller has a closeup image of the mint mark. Check how easy it is to see the mint mark on the "D" coins from 1916. Worn examples should have a very easy to see mint mark. The seller has a couple more, too.
Disclaimer--I am not advertising nor know the seller.
Tony
1916-D with solid "D"
Disclaimer--I am not advertising nor know the seller.
Tony
1916-D with solid "D"
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
0
Comments
as this one is it's likely partly due to strike and wear characteristics. Relatively few
mercs of any date were worn much more than this example.
Here the mintmark looks like the highest part of the coin. The grade of the mintmark doesn't match the rest of the coin. Often, the lower part of the D will be worn on AG3, FR2 coins. I would have to see it to really tell, but it looks like the D has been added.
FrederickCoinClub
Al
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
This is a real coin--one of mine.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
42/92