Home› PSA Set Registry Forum

What A joke (67 perez auction)

1967topps1967topps Posts: 459 ✭✭
in PSA Set Registry Forum
This guy should not be allowed to use the PSA name in his auction of this crappy card he's representing as a "7.5 overall"

(almost as bad as all the other ungraded cards where the seller writes "PSA 10?" and it's a piece of crap
and he says "I can put whatever I want in the title" in private conversation)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2784231724&category=2929&sspagename=STRK:MEBWA:IT&rd=1
ebay:1967topps
1967and 1973 Topps baseball wantlists (any condition) welcome. Once had the #14 ATF 1967 set. Yet another collector like skylaneflyer, gimel1 who made it to the completion of 1967 only to need the money more than the company of 609 close friends.
Looking for oddball Norm Cash and Cleon Jones stuff, and 1956 team cards

Comments

  • 34GoudeyCollector34GoudeyCollector Posts: 311
    Auction Link
    Ken's 1934 Goudey Registry Set
    - Slowly (Very Slowly) Working On A 1952 Topps Raw Set (Lower Grade)
  • 34GoudeyCollector34GoudeyCollector Posts: 311
    These PSA numbers are cracking me up (7.5 ?????????). One would think if they are grading the Big 4 characteristics of these cards against PSA standards, they would at least realize how stupid it is to put the odd-ball numbers in. And this card being a "7.5"?? How about a 3.5 image

    Ken
    Ken's 1934 Goudey Registry Set
    - Slowly (Very Slowly) Working On A 1952 Topps Raw Set (Lower Grade)
  • joker73joker73 Posts: 497 ✭
    I never knew PSA had grading standards for booklets ...

    Thanks for the impartial assessment ...

    Robert
  • johngjohng Posts: 17
    In the words of Mike Brady.... "Caveat emptor!" I think this malikai- is a real piece of work. But the bidders of his auctions have to take SOME responsibility!! Maybe they can look at the seller's previous feedback. Maybe they can verify whether or not the card in the scan is an officially graded "PSA 7.5"! I hate to see people get ripped off, but this seller might as well have a neon sign on the acution saying that his cards are junk! Personnaly, I think he should have graded the Tony Perez a "PSA 10.3" (low pop). That way he would really rake in the big $$$!
    johng
Sign In or Register to comment.