This is not my area of interest but I do undertstand the basic premise that the toning is "artificial"...
However, am I to understand that in artificially toning the coin he has altered (ruined in my opinion) a "genuine" 1829 Bust Half? It's a shame if that's the case. The coin only made it 165 years or so without such nonsense...!
Thx
Rufus T. Firefly: How would you like a job in the mint?
Chicolini: Mint? No, no, I no like a mint. Uh - what other flavor you got?
<< <i>This is not my area of interest but I do undertstand the basic premise that the toning is "artificial"...
However, am I to understand that in artificially toning the coin he has altered (ruined in my opinion) a "genuine" 1829 Bust Half? It's a shame if that's the case. The coin only made it 165 years or so without such nonsense...!
Comments
This is just another typical example. Look at all of his listings. All the coins look like that.
We ARE watching you.
However, am I to understand that in artificially toning the coin he has altered (ruined in my opinion) a "genuine" 1829 Bust Half? It's a shame if that's the case. The coin only made it 165 years or so without such nonsense...!
Thx
Chicolini: Mint? No, no, I no like a mint. Uh - what other flavor you got?
<< <i>This is not my area of interest but I do undertstand the basic premise that the toning is "artificial"...
However, am I to understand that in artificially toning the coin he has altered (ruined in my opinion) a "genuine" 1829 Bust Half? It's a shame if that's the case. The coin only made it 165 years or so without such nonsense...!
Thx >>
Yes and it's enough to make me want to cry!
Bust Half & FSB Merc Collector
K S
We ARE watching you.
This is simply an example from his "red" period.
Spin spin spin.