Home U.S. Coin Forum

A positive experience educating someone about ACG

BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
A few weeks ago, I saw this auction. I emailed the seller and told him I'd be interested in the coin if it was certified by a respected service (PCGS, NGC or ANACS). I suggested ANACS figuring it was a problem coin.

Being in LA, he took it to the Long Beach show, and sent me this email today:

Hello Barry,

Being more of a history buff than a coin collector and allowing myself to
become excited about an outstandingly awesome piece for the unaided eye, I
didn't look or know how to look for the tooling and other problems with
the coin. I only knew the original mintage, the fact that many were
melted and could only imagine who might have had this in their possesion
in 1795! Yesterday, January 30th, the coin was given to ANACS to A) leave
in the present ACG MS64 holder and B) have a written report attached to it
about the problems, by 4 to 5 people, with a total of 10 days turnaround
before it is in my hands again. A single ANACS authenticator/grader at
the Long Beach Show said that the genuine coin had a lot of tooling on the
surfaces and whizzing which gives it a net XF40. I know now that I
grossly over paid, for a true XF-40, although the coin was a raw on the
Long Beach floor, changing hands before it came to me. I also didn't know
that coins are routinely broken out of their holders and possibly reslabb

Thank you for you interest and sending me somewhere to, hopefully, take
care of the problems.

Don

Comments

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file