Is there really a $100 difference here?
BigKidAtHeart
Posts: 1,799 ✭✭
I realize that these cards are rough,
but is there really a $100 dollar difference
in these two cards?
$300
$400
but is there really a $100 dollar difference
in these two cards?
$300
$400
0
Comments
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
I am NOT saying there is no difference,
I am not sure that there is a $100
difference between these two
very poor condition cards.
Ken
- Slowly (Very Slowly) Working On A 1952 Topps Raw Set (Lower Grade)
you asked a question, and people answered it. whats the problem?
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
<< <i>the three posters felt there WAS a $100 difference between the cards.
you asked a question, and people answered it. whats the problem? >>
there no problem at all.
I was just explaining that
I do understand that there
IS a difference.
I did not want people to think
that I thought they were worth
the same.
that is all.
I DO appreciate everyone's opinions,
input and thoughts.
just do not try to make this into something.
$650.01
$3051.06
<< <i>some people prefer certain cards over other >>
Good point!
and truthfully these cards are not sold,
so it remains to be seen what they
are "really worth".
I just found it interesting to me.
<< <i>
<< <i>some people prefer certain cards over other >>
Good point!
and truthfully these cards are not sold,
so it remains to be seen what they
are "really worth".
I just found it interesting to me. >>
Definitely, no harm in looking. The funny thing is that there is so much discrepency with lower grade cards sometimes. PSA 1 might sell for $40 one day or $90 the next. Low grade collectors tend to decide on their own value for a card they need. I keep my value for most stuff at 8%, but I'll adjust for something I really need or want.
BKAH -- I think everyone understood your meaning from the first post. I wasn't trying to start anything. There are varying opinions/preferences especially in collector grade cards. Thanks for starting this thread. Thankfully PSA is grading more cards AUTH...
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
<< <i>The difference with the 61 Mantle is very noticeable, at least to me. I think a better comparison would have been a nice PSA 7 for 300ish and the PSA 8 that was pictured. The centering is off and the borders are yellowing. >>
Yes, but nowhere is the jump as dramatic in terms of $$ or % as from a PSA 8 to PSA 9, or PSA 9 to PSA 10. For many cards, the value just about doubles as a card increases a full "old timer" grade (Good, VG, Ex, NrMt) - 61 Mantle is a perfect example. About a $50 card in G, $100 in VG, $200 in Ex, $400 in NM - maybe $700-800 in NM/MT. Then it jumps $2000 which is 4x in MINT??
I understand the arguments for scarcity, buying the best, etc. - but this is where I've felt that high grade cards are overvalued relative to lower grade. Would I rather have 40 VG mantles or 1 MINT one? interesting to consider for the future.
I saw the same differences in the Mantles when I scanned eBay, I just don't think I saw any 7s listed. I wasn't using the example to argue aesthetics but rather to show that price variation can be severe from one grade to another.
Many people saw that between a solid 8, a solid 9, and a solid 10 there are few differences. I merely used the 8 and the 9 to point out that, by definition, not a lot really differs.
spacktrack