Home U.S. Coin Forum

"Like all proof sets, it is comprised of different metals than is used in the regular coin prin

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
Some auctions just crack me up. Plenty of other funny stuff in that one. image

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
    And it's a 1964 Franklin!!!!
    It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

  • LAWMANLAWMAN Posts: 1,274 ✭✭
    I like the NEVER DECREASE IN VALUE part. I have a slightly used bridge to sell; everyone knows that bridges never decrease in value either.
    DSW
  • "Proof sets never decrease in value." image
    Yes, they should always be worth at least face value.

    I paid $11 each from the Mint for my 1983, 1984 & 1985 sets.
    I apparently must be imagining that these now sell for under $10 each.
    "A happy person is not a person in a certain set of circumstances, but rather a person with a certain set of attitudes"--Hugh Downs
  • It must be a rare 1964 set,I've never seen a 1964 Franklin.This proof set would increase in value,if it were a 1964.HA HA HA.
  • Give him a break!! He's Russ' neighbor!!!image
    HEAD TUCKED AND ROLLING ALONG ENJOYING THE VIEW! [Most people I know!]

    NEVER LET HIPPO MOUTH OVERLOAD HUMMINGBIRD BUTT!!!

    WORK HARDER!!!!
    Millions on WELFARE depend on you!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file