Options
To dip or not to dip that is the question.

The coins attached below were stored in a regular Whitman "type set" Push in album (the no window type) for thirty years. All of the copper coins were toned so deep that they were enviromentally damaged. Most of the other coins in the set had extreme toning damaging the coins. These coins two coins are not damaged, but PCGS, NGC and ANACS said these are artifically toned. I would like to get them holdered to make them more marketable. Should I give up and just dip them? I really hate the "D" word.
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
From the scans, it is difficult to tell if these two coins were dipped out already. Both coins look flat and the lustre looks impaired. If these really are a deeper brown in color, it is possible that they were previously dipped and bleached. I am not saying that was done here with these two coins without seeing them. Scans are tough on lustre. Good luck with your decision.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>The toning is so deep that I'm afraid the degree of dipping necessary to remove it would strip the coins of any life. I think they look pretty damned nice just the way they are. >>
I agree.
Could you describe the colors? It's kind of hard to tell from the photos.
I don't mind coins the color of those myself, I just don't like black much.
I had a morgan the grandpa left that was so thick with toning it was forming crumbs on the surface.
I sent it to ncs and it came back in great shape.
The down side was the toning hid the cleaning underneath
K S