Home› PCGS Set Registry Forum

opinions...this isnt a 70

pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
in PCGS Set Registry Forum
mine literally blows this outta the water

see how the top of monticello has 3 distinct areas defined? a 70fs should also
show this detail on jeffersons forehead, which this example lacks.
image

Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill

Comments

  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    I'll never understand way this one is not a 70 either: ( PCGS only gave it a 69 )

    image
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • DAMDAM Posts: 2,410 ✭✭


    << <i>I'll never understand way this one is not a 70 either: ( PCGS only gave it a 69 ) >>


    The day your coin was graded was "tails" day. When the grader flipped the coin for your nickel it landed on heads. image
    Dan
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    Just my Luckimage

    Bigger images

    image
    image
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500 ✭
    ? maybe the 'spot' above the S in states on the reverse knocked it one point ?
  • tgilliamstgilliams Posts: 1,969
    That 70 looks aweful nice, love to see a picture of yours.

    The MS69 looks like a slam-dunk 70 to me. The fields ans detail on the devices couldn't be improved upon IMHO. Break it out and re-submit. Can't hurt WCS another MS69, though better than 50% chance would come back as a 70. Do the math, your downside is minimial and upside is substantial.

    Seems like a no-brainer
    PCGS sets under The Thomas Collections. Modern Commemoratives @ NGC under "One Coin at a Time". USMC Active 1966 thru 1970" The real War.
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    All spots and marks are on the holder.
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    I wish I had my olddddddddd deep dish scanner...boy what justice it gave slabs...now i have this thin one which turned out good for only docs
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
Sign In or Register to comment.