Options
AU58 - great values
I saw a thread recently about AU58 being a great value grade. I completely agree. I just picked up this 1907 $2.50 graded PCGS AU58 for only $20 more than the going rate for burned out, ratty, smelly, dog-flea'd AU58s. It has a complete mint state 63 look - good luster, strong strike, few marks. Only the barest whisper of contact on the high points. What a steal. I would buy coins like this for my collection all day long. Post your fav AU58 or tell us a good story.
Tom
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
0
Comments
MS62 is a value grade, too.
And the nicest looking MS62 coins I've had also happened to be $2.50 Lib's.
SSP:
I've got a 1907 Repunched Date quarter eagle in AU58, if you like 'em like that.
It has the PQ look you mentioned but is in less-appealing plastic: PCI gold label. Still, I think they got the grade right, and it has the luster and eye appeal of a Mint State coin. Nice slider. Probably cheaper than your PCGS, too, but the difference in plastic would account for that.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
Tom
<< <i>Except the better date and key date and semi key date Morgans in AU58 are very tough to find. >>
My guess is that my raw, so-called MS-63's are really AU-58's. It's not worth finding out since most cost less that $30, but it would be an interesting experiment. I love AU-58's. I think it's the sweet spot for collectors, but geniune ones are tough to find. BTW, mine are obviously not key dates.
That Barber half looks great! Definitely follow-up with us after it gets here.
Tom - That 1891 quarter is just dripping luster. Awesome. Without that bit of rub and the spot, it would be a solid 64.
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
> Without that bit of rub and the spot, it would be a solid 64.
Would you call it AU64?
<< <i>Would you call it AU64? >>
I would call it a good deal.
jom
I love the crimson color on your half dollar. You've been saving your money, I see!
Dave