Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Fake 1893-s Morgan?

What do you think about this?


Link

Comments

  • Options
    JamericonJamericon Posts: 445 ✭✭✭
    I do not think so. There is nothing from the scan that makes me weary.
    Jamie Yakes - U.S. paper money collector, researcher, and author. | Join the SPMCUS Small-Size Notes, National Bank Notes, and NJ Depression Scrip
  • Options
    PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Modified pics to see the coins details better.

    image


    image
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There's nothing in the scan that makes me weary, but the ALL-CAPS description does, and the fact it's raw makes me wary.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Does the 1 in the date look like its over the denticle?
    Is that a seam in the bottom or picture oddness?
  • Options
    JamericonJamericon Posts: 445 ✭✭✭
    As Marcovan said, the one warning sign of this coin is its status of being uncertified!
    Jamie Yakes - U.S. paper money collector, researcher, and author. | Join the SPMCUS Small-Size Notes, National Bank Notes, and NJ Depression Scrip
  • Options
    clw54clw54 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭
    The date looks reasonable. The one is positioned over the denticle, and the three is higher than the rest of the number. Still wouldn't bid on it.
  • Options
    The only way that I would bid on it is if I had it in my hand and could clearly see the telltale die markers on the crossbar of the "T" and the rabbits ears in the "R" of "LIBERTY". Every 1893-S Morgan will have those die markers, according to everything I have read.
    Gary
    image
  • Options
    BubbleheadBubblehead Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭
    After reading the 3 negs, I'd especially stay away from this one.
  • Options
    Beartracks42 has the right idea - that coin would have to be seen up close and the diagnostics determined before venturing into anything like that. Bytheway - I've seen plenty of raw 1893's at shows - well - plenty being like 10. These come out of album collections, so I wouldn't be too leary of LOOKING at raw ones - IF you know what diagnostics to look for.
  • Options
    I wouldn't bid on it. It just looks strange to me, and the slab is conspicuous in its absence.
  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,965 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin looks genuine to me. The date has the slight deviation angle/(distance of digits off rim) as you read from the first 1 thru the rest of the date. Also the numerals are lined up properly in accordance with the diagnostics. Looks right at XF to me, maybe not a ceritifiable xf?

    But as others said, I would never buy this coin with out being able to view it in person, nor would I pay the stronger money by far that the 93-s are bringing with it being a raw coin, and especially on e-bay.
  • Options
    The seller guarantee's its authenticity BUT what if you bought it and found it FAKE, return it and he says its not the same coin??
    Its a foul ball by a fair margin.
  • Options
    Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    The strange shine & periph stains makes it look to be cleaned, the mm is either added or has damage, and it's a VF not XF which is only a $2,000 difference in price but I really don't see it being altered.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • Options
    DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,100 ✭✭✭✭✭
    BB-CLD
    Doug

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file