How is this not a DCAM? (Or even a CAM?) ?

spadesjedi · November 21, 2003 1:18AM

PIC

itsnotjustme · November 21, 2003 1:22AM

Mistakenly left off, and no-one has felt the need to spend $12 to get it back on? Besides a little weakness in lettering it is caked (not painted) on.

XpipedreamR · November 21, 2003 2:35AM

I'd guess it's just an error and since it's a low value coin no one bothered to send it back.

Although there is some major lacking in the lettering on both the obverse and reverse. I don't know how PCGS would view this; maybe they don't consider this CAM despite the DCAM devices.

MoneyLA · November 21, 2003 2:44AM

To be optimistic, they made a mistake in the labeling. To be pessimistic-- pcgs found a pin head sized spot without frosting and they felt the coin did not warrant a cam or dcam designation. a few months ago I sent in a group of 1960 proof washingtons -- and I felt everyone was a cam or even a dcam and NONE came back so designated. cheers, alan mendelson

How is this not a DCAM? (Or even a CAM?) ?

Comments