Ding. Ding. Ding. Jeremy got it: The first is a large motto (bronze). The second is a J-370 (pure copper). The third is J-371 (copper-nickel: about 88-12).
I'm intrigued by the copper vs. bronze. Yes, there's no question that both types exist. But WHY?
Possible reasons:
1. Copper is softer. Therefore, maybe the copper strikes are true "die trials".
2. The more variations issued, the more coins could be sold to contemporary collectors. Then again, would 19th century collectors really care about the subtle difference between copper and bronze? (Yes, I understand that the color difference is most obvious on newly struck full red coins, but it's still pretty subtle.)
3. Whoever prepared that batch of planchets forgot or didn't bother to alloy the copper. If it was a small batch to be used for patterns and proofs, he might have figured that it just wasn't worth the effort to prepare "proper" planchets.
My money is on #3.
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic. Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Comments
Edited to add: And, believe it or not, they're all proof.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Possible reasons:
1. Copper is softer. Therefore, maybe the copper strikes are true "die trials".
2. The more variations issued, the more coins could be sold to contemporary collectors. Then again, would 19th century collectors really care about the subtle difference between copper and bronze? (Yes, I understand that the color difference is most obvious on newly struck full red coins, but it's still pretty subtle.)
3. Whoever prepared that batch of planchets forgot or didn't bother to alloy the copper. If it was a small batch to be used for patterns and proofs, he might have figured that it just wasn't worth the effort to prepare "proper" planchets.
My money is on #3.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.